October 02, 2008

This is the thread where I'll be blogging tonight

And just to make it interesting, you're all invited to make use of the Palin bingo card that Kathleen just forwarded to me.

http://www.palinbingo.com/

If you get "Bingo" just shout out.

We go live at 8:59 PM.

8:58: Okay, I'm ready to go. Comments below the cut line.

PAD

8:59: Kath and Ariel each have two Palin Bingo cards. We are watching it, as before, on PBS.

9:01: Personally I can't wait for the SNL parody. I'd wager the entire writing staff of SNL is watching it in one room, getting ready to toss around jokes and comments.

9:02: can there be "toward" outbursts?

9:03: Biden brushes aside the question phrasing and goes straight for a canned answer. And he goes with the A plan: Push Obama. That's what he needs to do. Because ultimately Biden is selling Obama while Palin is selling herself, because there's a greater concern that she will wind up in the presidency than there is that Biden will.

9:05: Palin immediately goes to her strong suit: Go for the street-level concerns. Soccer moms.

9:07: Thank God she noticed neither of them answered the question. Palin is handling herself (of course) better than expected. How could she not?

9:10: She's been coached well. The "hecks" and "darn its" are starting to get to me.

9:11: So far it's playing out as expected: Palin uses the personable, down-home, "aw shucks" approach that makes it easy for her to connect to the rank and file. Biden comes across like the college professor that made you want to slit your wrists. This could wind up being painful for Obama's camp.

9:14: Biden's getting tougher on her now. He has to.

9:14: "I may not answer questions the way you and the moderator want to, but I'll be talking straight." Yeah, that was written for her by McCain's people; a nice all purpose dodge.

9:15: Biden's starting to find his stride. "Where I come from, we call it fairness." Good line.

9:17: She's going for the Biden taxes patriotic line. Let's see if he has a comeback for it.

9:18: Five grand doesn't buy health care. It just doesn't.

9:19: Biden's staying focused, which he doesn't always do. He's remaining concise. And he's doing a nice job of demolishing the McCain plan. "The Ultimate Bridge to Nowhere." Excellent.

9:21: Smart. What are we going to have to cut? Foreign aid. It's a substantive cut that no one in the US will give a damn about. Let's see if Palin has something substantive as well.

9:23: Boy, she's REALLY off topic. I mean, I know that they don't always answer the questions directly, but this is just so off the rails it's laughable.

9:24: No specifics. But hey, she's got an excuse: She's only been on this five weeks. How nice.

9:25: Ah! Biden co-opts her Alaska moves. Clever.

9:26: Some of the air seems to be seeping from Palin. Her posture is changing; her shoulders are a bit more slumped, her smile isn't quite as ready. And her voice is becoming a bit more brittle.

9:28: The thing is, it's easier to remain a policy wonk for ninety minutes than it is to be an aw shucks soccer mom outsider for ninety minutes.

9:29: Back to energy? WTF?

9:30: Well, she reversed the sentence structure. And you HAVE to study the causes! What the hell? Biden can shred her on this; she's starting to sound like Tina Fey.

9:32: Yes! Yes! Thank God Biden's going after it squarely. I just wish he'd looked at her and said, "Governor, with all respect, you were all over the place."

9:34: Ariel's closer with Bingo, but Kath has a lot of foreign policy stuff on her boards.

9:36: But they're stopping short of asking about same sex marriage.

9:37: Well, gee, I'm thrilled that she's tolerant, except she doesn't want gays to be able to be married.

9:38: Well, that's a damned shame that they don't support that. Makes him no better than Palin.

9:39: Ah! We have a plan! Let's hear it, Governor. Wow us.

9:40: Still waiting to hear the plan.

9:41: And the plan would be?

9:41: Thank God Biden pointed out that she never presented a plan. And Obama already addressed the voting question, which Biden is now reiterating. Didn't Palin see the previous debate.

9:42: Okay. Palin says Biden's plan is a white flag. AND HER PLAN WOULD BE?

9:43: WHAT'S HER DAMNED PLAN?

9:44: Ariel has the first Bingo. "Tax Relief," "Job Creation," "National Guard" and Drill" with the center space free.

9:45: Biden just seems to be getting stronger and stronger.

9:47: Crap. She can't say "nuclear." She can, however, say Akmijinidad (however you spell it)

9:50: He's making a valid point about the concept of speaking with people who we don't like.

9:51: As the Jewish vote perks up...

9:52: God, I wish he wouldn't refer to himself in the third person.

9:53: Biden is meticulously shredding the Bush Israel policy. Now he has to connect McCain to it.

9:54: Palin tries to short circuit criticism of the Bush administration, which she has to do if she hopes to salvage this.

9:55: And there's the connection. Now let's see if Palin can counter it.

9:58: Could we at least have a VP who knows the correct use of "Be all, end all?"

9:59: But we don't have troops available to put INTO Afghanistan. That's the problem.

9:59: I want him to say, "Joe Biden has to say this again."

10:00: Biden started to sigh in exasperation and then I think he caught himself doing so.

10:03: Biden now starts talking about where he's been, using the McCain tactic.

10:03: But he DID tell why he voted for it.

10:04; No one's said "respect" for a while. "Respect" was fast becoming the new "John is absolutely correct."

10:06: She's trying to bring it back to Biden and she's not doing a particularly good job.

10:07: John McCain knows how to win a war. Which war has he won, exactly?

10:08: This is a puffball question that allows them to hit all the major policy points of their respective platforms. Biden's doing great with it. Palin should be able to nail this too.

10:09: Except she's speaking in generalities.

10:10: GODDAMMIT, PALIN, SAY SOMETHING SPECIFIC!

10:11: An hour after my 9:11 observation and I couldn't have been more wrong.

10:12: Nice try with the aw-shucks routine, but she laid it on too thick. Reagan got away with "There you go again," but she piled on with gosh darn it and "say it ain't so, Joe." Too much. And now she's once again desperately off track.

10:13: Palin makes a nice connect trying to brush off the "what does a vice president even do?" comment from weeks ago.

10:14: Kath finally got a Palin bingo. "Alaska," "Special needs," "Hockey mom," "Terrorist" and the free square.

10:15: Thank God Biden seems to have mastered personal pronouns.

10:16: For God's sake, just say No, of course not, that the vice presidency is under the exec branch! Jeez!

10:17: Thank you, Senator.

10:18: Except the mod asked about weaknesses. Palin's answer isn't remotely on track. Or maybe that's displaying the weakness right there: She's a FREAKING MORON

10:19: Ariel has another Bingo. "Maverick," "Obama," "National Guard," "Bailout," "heartland"

10:21: I know he didn't do it manipulatively, but his choking up just now is going to floor people. That was perfect. Very emotional and he managed to rein himself in just in time so that he will come across as strong.

10:22: Did I hear that right? "He's the man we need to leave, I mean lead."

10:23: Biden's pounding McCain into the ground with his own maverick label. Outstanding.

10:24: He's killing her. Biden's freaking killing her.

10:25: Oooo. He started a little dull with this answer, but he's laid a trap for Palin with roe v. Wade. Let's see if she steps in.

10:26: Nope. She didn't.

10:27: Could we put a moratorium on "walk the walk" and "talk the talk" for the rest of the debates? Please?

10:28: Holy crap. We have 204 comments on this thread. That's more than twice as much on the presidential debate.

10:30: sarah Palin wants to be able to speak without the filter of the media. Or the filter of intelligence.

10:31: Interesting. Now Biden is swinging back to that semi-somnabulant tone from the beginning of the debate.

10:32: But he perked up at the end.

Absolutely no question: Biden. He started off slow, she started off fast, but she couldn't sustain it and he just kept pounding away.

Biden made all sorts of valid policy points, but I bet the big talking point becomes how Biden got choked up.

Posted by Peter David at October 2, 2008 01:30 PM | TrackBack | Other blogs commenting
Comments
Posted by: Dave Drier at October 2, 2008 02:54 PM

Shouldn't you shout "Pal-ingo!" if you win?

Posted by: Daddy G. at October 2, 2008 03:42 PM

Now, now... Let's not be so obviously partisan. Here's a page which claims (I didn't actually check) to have Bingo cards for both candidates' talking points. After all, it's not as if only Palin and the Republicans have scripted points to segue into and highlight frequently.

Posted by: Maconga_J at October 2, 2008 04:29 PM

Daddy G, did you really say "let's not be so obviously partisan?"

Boy are you barking up the wrong tree coming here! hehe.

In all seriousness though, you generally do get some well-thought out discussion on the left side of the political spectrum here--more so than DailyKos or HuffingtonPost; That's why I come here after reading my daily dose of National Review: to get some sensible arguments from both sides.

(Sorry, Peter. This was probably not the place to discuss this, but I got on a roll..)

Posted by: Ed at October 2, 2008 07:29 PM

How could they do these cards and leave off "Joe Six-Pack"?

--Ed

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:05 PM

Palin: Can I call you Joe?

Interesting start. Does he call her Sarah? How does any of that play?

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:06 PM

Biden seems a little sedate. I think he could use some more energy.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:07 PM

Now Palin's selling McCain.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:07 PM

9:04 "Is this the best of Washington or the worst?" What kind of question is that? The last thing a moderator should do is ask a question that gives so much room for the candidate to give a vague, generalized, rhetorical, self-serving response. I would've hoped for a more substantive question that would allow the public to pin down the candidates' positions more easily.

Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 09:08 PM

McCain suspended his campaign, what a crock, she's out of the gate with the first lie.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:08 PM

Scratch that. Not just sedate. Sleepy. His words even seem a little slurred.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:09 PM

She's speeding through her lines, hardy pausing for a breath. Overly rehearsed.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:10 PM

McCain - new?

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:10 PM

Wow, she *actually* winked at the camera when saying that McCain meant American workers when he said "fundamentals." She knows how to work the camera when she lies.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:10 PM

9:09 As scripted speeches-as-answers-to-questions go, that one that Palin just gave sounded pretty good.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:11 PM

Wait America is tired of the same old boys and hungry for something new so let's put McCain in?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:11 PM

She actually said Joe Six-Pack. Holy crud. Toss out the bingo cards, we're into the drinking game.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:11 PM

Should have gone with Joe Six-Pack on my card.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:12 PM

PAD, they actually had a right not to answer the second question. The format was supposed to include time to respond to each others' answers, which Gwen did not give them for the first question.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:12 PM

Nice work by Biden trying to connect McCain (properly) to the deregulation obsession. This is typical running-mate stuff, but he's doing it well.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:14 PM

The "darn its" are driving me nuts, too. I'm interested in Biden's facial expressions during Palin's answers. It seems to be of a good-natured "you must be kidding" variety.

And now he rebuts. Nice.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:15 PM

Biden comes across like the college professor that made you want to slit your wrists.

Doesn't seem that way to me, but maybe we knew different professors in college. :-)


Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 09:15 PM

SHe keeps avoiding the questions! She saddled 5000+ people with 21 million in debt, but didn't raise taxes.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:15 PM

"I may not answer the questions the moderator asks" had me laughing so hard.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:16 PM

"To heck with what the question is! To heck with the debate! I'll talk about whatever I like. Hey, didja catch my kid's soccer game last night?"

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:17 PM

She's not going to really answer the questions? The only true thing Palin will say all night.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:17 PM

Oooh nice work by Biden there pointing out that McCain voted the same way.

As for the whole I'm not going to answer the way you like or the way the moderator likes? A smart play but i8t irritates the hell out of me.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:18 PM

Okay, so far I have Tax Relief, Obama, and Maverick. What do you have?

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:19 PM

9:17 She pushes the "I'm from a small-town" bullshit, as if that means anything.

Meanwhile, here are 11 myths about Palin: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23140513/the_truth_about_sarah_pa

Posted by: Lou at October 2, 2008 09:19 PM

Why is it that whenever Palin looks at the camera, it seems like she's reading off of a teleprompter? Or at the very least, reciting memorized lines....

Posted by: Fred Chamberlain at October 2, 2008 09:19 PM

I just realized something... I really don't want Joe Six-pack or hockey mom in the White House. They are concepts in name and unqualified in reality. I'd also love for either candidate to point out that the American people need to be honest in looking at tightening up their own belts and being willing to lower their standard of living. That is what needs to happen when you don't have the $$$ to buy a flat screen television, buy a large house, etc..

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:19 PM

I think Biden is doing well. Even when he talks about Palin not answering a question, he brings it back around to talking about McCain.

It's okay if she looks better than him. That will fade in a couple of days as long as that's all the headline they have. If the entire debate is about the differences between McCain and Obama, then this debate won't have any affect on the race. With Obama in the lead, they'll be very happy with that result.

Posted by: Marina O. at October 2, 2008 09:20 PM

I have maverick,reformer, job creation, tax relief, family, Hockey mom,and track. 2 away from bingo!!

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:21 PM

First, Obama's health-care proposal ain't government=run. Second, saying "if you like the idea of government-run health care" avoids the fact that most people on Medicare DO like it well enough, and I certainly don't hear Congresscritters complaining about their health care.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:21 PM

Obama-Biden like the "95%" line. Too bad that they keep using it about subjects where it's not the right %.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:21 PM

That Bridge to Nowhere line was pure pwnage.

Posted by: Nivek at October 2, 2008 09:21 PM

She using so many keywords, kids are gonna die from alcohol poisoning.

Is it that bad? She didn't just say she was going to answer the questions with whatever she wants? My god, is it just me?

Real Bridge to Nowhere. Yo Joe.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:22 PM

Biden gets a laugh on the "Ultimate Bridge to nowhere" comment. Ouch, she doesn't even get to reply to it. Point to Biden.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:22 PM

Bridge to nowhere NICE!

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:24 PM

Is the sound going in and out for anyone else? I'm watching on PBS.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:24 PM

Ok. She's talking directly to him. He has to go right at her now. This could be tricky.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

Peter David: 9:14: "I may not answer questions the way you and the moderator want to, but I'll be talking straight." Yeah, that was written for her by McCain's people; a nice all purpose dodge.
Luigi Novi: Reminds me of how so-called psychics use preemptive dodges to explain why they might end up being wrong with their predictions. "I'm not always right.....this is just a feeling I'm getting.....maybe it applies to someone you know and not you....." It's a way to rationalize your future screw-ups in order to keep them from being criticized.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

Peter David: 9:14: "I may not answer questions the way you and the moderator want to, but I'll be talking straight." Yeah, that was written for her by McCain's people; a nice all purpose dodge.
Luigi Novi: Reminds me of how so-called psychics use preemptive dodges to explain why they might end up being wrong with their predictions. "I'm not always right.....this is just a feeling I'm getting.....maybe it applies to someone you know and not you....." It's a way to rationalize your future screw-ups in order to keep them from being criticized.

Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

She's back to clicking her tongue! What did they shoot her up with? She sounds like a child on a sugar high.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

"There isn't much that I've promised, except to do what is right."

Oh. Come. ON.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

Five grand doesn't buy health care. It just doesn't.

That's not true, Peter, it just won't buy it for more than a couple of months. Hey, if all the poor and middle class people out there (like me) just don't get sick or hurt all that often then that should be more than enough.

{Sarcasm Off}

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

Oh come on! "I've only been here 5 weeks"! Unbelievable!

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 09:25 PM

The time constraints have really forced Joe to focus.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:26 PM

Palin's making it look like Obama gave money to oil companies and she took it away. Insteresting, I think they may stick with people. The facts are fuzzier, of course, but that's a subtle thing to get across.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:27 PM

His response was WAY too technical. It should have been more focused on hitting back at McCain in a concise, easy to understand way.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:27 PM

Ah, nice. I'm glad Biden is pointing out that the tax on Oil Companies she's so proud of is actually something McCain has fought on the national level. I was wondering when someone would point that out.

Posted by: Delmo Walters Jr. at October 2, 2008 09:28 PM

"Joe Six Pack" and "Wall Street" should've been squares on the bingo board.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:28 PM

Just got Main Street.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:28 PM

Biden did a decent job in redirecting that.

She's coming out okay as long as you ignore the fact that she can't answer the questions as asked

Posted by: Lou at October 2, 2008 09:28 PM

David, I'm watching on ABC; no sound issues here...

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:29 PM

Ok, again I'm stuck with XM rather than TV. So my question to you all is...

Does she look as lost and clueless as she sounds?

Jeez... McCain brought people in/together on this bill? Did she say that with a straight face?

Posted by: Lou at October 2, 2008 09:30 PM

Why can't this woman FOCUS?!?!?!?!

Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 09:30 PM

THis isn't a debate, it's fracking Palin off the fracking rails. I WANT ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS!

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:31 PM

It's amazing how often she wants to go back to an earlier subject. I hate this format, it gives her an excuse to say that she didn't have enough time on the subjects she likes and use that as a time to eat up time on the subjects she doesn't like.

Posted by: BBOvenGuy at October 2, 2008 09:32 PM

Palin isn't nearly as good at pivoting. Her responses are rambling more, too. It's only 1/3 of the way through the debate. Is she going to hold up?

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:32 PM

$700 Billion is a flat out lie again. They've been corrected. Still, at least, unlike McCain this morning, she didn't say that we're sending it all to countries that hate us.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:32 PM

But Governor, if you insist that you don't want to know why climate change is occurring, you cannot properly address what you're going to do about it. That's basic.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:32 PM

Is it just me, or did she just turn to Biden with an uncertain look during her overly rehearsed breathless speech, and he gave her a reassuring nod? This is sad.

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

So you don't want to talk about the causes but you want to fix the problem of climate changes. Nice

R-

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

I don't want to argue about the causes climate change. of course not because it might affect the people you need for support

Posted by: Fred Chamberlain at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

Not only is she becoming more and more seemingly unsure of what she is saying with the stutters and pauses, but she is becoming more and more disjointed and tossing out unarguable generalizations that don't actually say anything. substantial.

Posted by: Fred Chamberlain at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

Not only is she becoming more and more seemingly unsure of what she is saying with the stutters and pauses, but she is becoming more and more disjointed and tossing out unarguable generalizations that don't actually say anything. substantial.

Posted by: Fred Chamberlain at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

Not only is she becoming more and more seemingly unsure of what she is saying with the stutters and pauses, but she is becoming more and more disjointed and tossing out unarguable generalizations that don't actually say anything. substantial.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:33 PM

Hot DAMN. Biden made the same point I did.

Posted by: jason at October 2, 2008 09:34 PM

I think all of this is very sad. Palin was probably the perfect choice for Governor of Alaska -- but she's in no way prepared for this -- she's memorized a whole bunch of factoids, but she doesn't believe in it. It's just words for her.

She looks like a child trying to win a spelling bee and she's struggling to remember her name.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:35 PM

"Drill baby, drill"?! People cry that out at rallies?

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:35 PM

Senator O'Biden. Hee hee.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:35 PM

Wait -- she's BOASTING about the "drill baby drill" chant? Something that's uncomfortably close to cheering piracy? Yeesh.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:36 PM

No, Governor, you aren't building a pipeline. You paid someone $500,000 to *consider* building a pipeline, which they don't have to give back if they don't build it.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:37 PM

9:24: No specifics. But hey, she's got an excuse: She's only been on this five weeks. How nice.
Luigi Novi: Not good. She shouldn't be emphasizing or calling attention to something which her critics criticize her for.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:37 PM

"Drill baby, drill"?! People cry that out at rallies?

Yep. Been there and seen it.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:37 PM

same sex benefits? oh wow this is going to be fun.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:38 PM

Biden's arguing a very strong civil unions policy now. That's actually kinda ballsy to argue that so strongly in the height of the campaign.

Meanwhile, Palin --
"I am tolerant, and I'll kill and field-dress anyone who says I'm not."

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:39 PM

Chosing? Gay people can chose? Really?

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:39 PM

Oh God. Oh no. Please don't talk about gay issues right now. This is a losing battle in a presidential campaign. Oh man, Biden really stepped in it.

On the other hand, she is actually striking a relatively tolerant tone for a Republican. But still, this is a no-win for Democrats. Geez.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:39 PM

A half hour in and Biden hasn't tripped up yet. He's still calling her 'Governor' and being very respectful.

Posted by: David Serchay at October 2, 2008 09:39 PM

So some of her best friends are gay

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:39 PM

A straight answer about same sex marriage by Joe. It may just shoot down some of the weaker support they had.

Too bad really.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:40 PM

What the hell did she just say about gay marriage in response to Biden?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:40 PM

I wish someone would actually emerge in favor of same-sex marriage, but Biden made as good a statement as we're likely to get any time soon.

Posted by: AMC at October 2, 2008 09:41 PM

9:37: Well, gee, I'm thrilled that she's tolerant, except she doesn't want gays to be able to be married.

And neither does Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:41 PM

"We don't need early withdrawal!"

Perhaps this explains Bristol. (I know, cheap shot...)

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:41 PM

Wow, Gwen is asking Palin for an Iraq exit strategy. That's asking a lot.

Of course, Palin is completely avoiding the actual question. She did it subtlety enough that a lot of people might miss it, though.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

9:36: But they're stopping short of asking about same sex marriage.

Spoke too soon PAD

Sadly both said no to it, but frankly I don't think you can say yes in the US right now and have a hope of winning.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

Ahhh, the surge is part of our exit strategy. It's all so clear to me now.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

Okay, I missed the entire question: Did the moderator ask Palin what their plan for Iraq IS? Because Palin is now talking about the surge, which was Bush's plan, has nothing to do with her or McCain, and is using that to attack Obama and Biden.

Oh, okay, so she WAS asked her plan. And she's not giving an answer beyond the vague "we must not give up" pep rally crap.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

Don't tell us what you don't need to do in Iraq you nitwit.

Ah, the hallow "win" comment.

Joe shoots and scores in his response!!!

Posted by: Fred Chamberlain at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

"With all due respect, I didn't hear a plan." Good for you Joe.

Posted by: mike weber at October 2, 2008 09:42 PM

Posted by: jason

I think all of this is very sad. Palin was probably the perfect choice for Governor of Alaska -- but she's in no way prepared for this -- she's memorized a whole bunch of factoids, but she doesn't believe in it. It's just words for her.

I'mnot sure she was the best choice for Governor of Alsak.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:43 PM

If she pronounces it "Eye-rack" one more time I swear I'm going to reach through the screen and bep her nose or something. Ggggggah.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:43 PM

The surge works, victory is in sight and General Patrais is an American hero?

Bizarro much?

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:43 PM

Wow... she just had her deer in the headlights moment.

"Um....."

Posted by: Christine at October 2, 2008 09:44 PM

A lot of insincere "respect" flying around.

Posted by: mike weber at October 2, 2008 09:45 PM

"Alsak"? Oops.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:45 PM

On gay marriage, I wish Biden had mentioned that Obama wants to leave it up to states. It's not a great answer, but it's better than nothing.

Hmm, Palin is going a little off script on the exit from Iraq. Still mostly slogans that we've heard before, but she had more ums, less smiles, and less interesting stuff to say. I think she's off her footing a little.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:45 PM

Although Biden's answering it well, I (unfortunately) think Palin's coming off well at the moment mentioning Biden's criticism of Obama. It's somewhat misleading, but that's par for the course.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:46 PM

No Joe, it's only $60 billion. You and Obama have had that pointed out to you several times now. You have a point on Iraq, a strong point, so please stop making up the math to make it seem like a stronger point.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 09:46 PM

Matt Adler: Oh God. Oh no. Please don't talk about gay issues right now. This is a losing battle in a presidential campaign. Oh man, Biden really stepped in it.
Luigi Novi: Well, the moderator asked that question. What's he supposed to do? Lie? Give a bullshit non-answer like the kind Palin gave Katie Couric?

David: "Drill baby, drill"?! People cry that out at rallies?
Luigi Novi: Yeah. Her daughter and her boyfriend when they're behind the bleachers.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:47 PM

"I wish Biden had mentioned that Obama wants to leave it up to states"

Yes. That is the "correct" answer in this situation.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:48 PM

9:45: Biden just seems to be getting stronger and stronger.

But not who you want to have a beer with. That factor will play big later on in the spin.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:48 PM

NUCULAR?

Ptui. Ptui. Ptui.

I will not stand another person in the executive branch who Cannot Fucking Talk.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:48 PM

"What's he supposed to do? Lie? Give a bullshit non-answer like the kind Palin gave Katie Couric?"

See above.

Posted by: Julianna at October 2, 2008 09:51 PM

mahmoud akmadinijad

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:52 PM

I don't know if bringing up the Spain gaffe is necessarily a good idea. It's certainly valid, but it could be spun as mean-spirited.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 09:52 PM

"She can, however, say Akmijinidad (however you spell it)"

Well, it really shouldn't matter since they use a completely different alphabet, but... Ahmedinejad is the most common English spelling (Achmedinejad would be more accurate, but the Semitic "ch" sound scares English-speakers).

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 09:53 PM

Yeah, what does McCain have against Spain?

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:53 PM

I hate the stupid preconditions argument.

Preconditions is demanding that the other side give you something you want before you even start negotiating. If you go to a car dealership and he salesman says, "You have to give me $1000 before I'll let you look at the cars," you'd walk away from that lot. Everyone would. Nobody is stupid enough to do that, and our enemies aren't either. Demanding preconditions is demanding that negotiations never actually happen.

Note: Biden shouldn't have hit the "Spain" comment again. Everyone heard that at the last debate, all the impact is gone. Come one, new material, man!

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:54 PM

Does she have a clue about the Middle East beyond the fact that there's a lot of sand over there?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:54 PM

Biden is sounding REALLY good, I think. Agree or disagree with him, he clearly is talking from a lot of experience and a lot of thought.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:56 PM

Wow, now she's bringing up the "blame game" and saying that Obama-Biden are spending too much time looking backwards.

Yes, Governor. It's called learning from history.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:56 PM

Palin just mentioned a little history about peace making in Israel. That might make the audiences at home feel like she actually knows something about the rest of the world.

I think Biden is hitting back hard, though. He's saying that the Bush administration is a failure and she's not going to get far by saying that it isn't.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 09:56 PM

Maverick again!!! Take another shot.

Posted by: critter42 at October 2, 2008 09:56 PM

9:47: Crap. She can't say "nuclear."
Jiminy Christmas - would people just lay the eff off of this? Of all the things out of the last 8 years, everyone harping on this has been the thing that annoys the piss out of me most. I mean really, there's literally thousands of things more important out there than someone's personal dialect.

Let me lay my cards on the table. I am *more* than well aware of the "correct" pronunciation of the word. I was in the Nuclear Navy. I went to Naval Nuclear Power School. I was a Nuclear-qualified Electrician's Mate. My best friend from the Navy still works at a nuclear power plant. We both still (and many of the people we went to power school with, especially from the south and west) pronounce it "nucular" - it is part of our dialect. If you think it makes me sound stupid, eff you.

Posted by: Christine at October 2, 2008 09:57 PM

::groans:: You know, after waiting so long to have a real chance at having a woman in the Pres or VP position... What a disappointment she is.

BTW anyone hear her mention Karzai? I need that for bingo...

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 09:57 PM

I haven't heard the differences Nicely done Biden. Shame the moderator changed the subject.

Posted by: Lou at October 2, 2008 09:57 PM

Jeez, looks like she's gonna cry...


Big meanie, Joe...

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 09:58 PM

"Can we talk about Afganistan now for a little bit"

Um, no. You're supposed to stick with the question.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 09:59 PM

Damn, Joe ties McCain to Bush with such a purty knot.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 09:59 PM

Nice, now Biden is connecting Bush to McCain on foreign policy. Meanwhile, Palin is spouting catch-phrases as fast as she can talk. I feel like the word "maverick is actually attacking me at this point."

However, she's doing well as far as audiences at home are going to be able to tell. She's not saying the smartest stuff, but she's looking much, much better than she did in the Couric interview. That's going to reassure some people.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:59 PM

Jiminy Christmas - would people just lay the eff off of this?

No.

I'm not saying it's the most important thing in the world, but willful ignorance of the English language is something that I really cannot abide.

If that's what annoys you the most in the last eight years, then I respectfully submit that you haven't been paying much attention.

Posted by: Nivek at October 2, 2008 10:00 PM

Oh god, she is trying to kill us with the word Nucular.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:00 PM

I also need Karzai; I haven't heard it yet.

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 10:01 PM

At least she's looking at Biden.

R-

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:01 PM

Has she said "job creation"?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:02 PM

"Bosniacks"? Is that really the term for them?

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:03 PM

Bosniacs???????

Didn't they kick Superman's butt once?

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:03 PM

Hey! She smirked when he said "Dick Luger". Granted, I did too, but still....

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:04 PM

Bosniacs? I thought it was Bosnians. Bosniacs sounds a lot cooler.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:04 PM

Palin, enough's enough. Stop with the cute "y'knows" and ADDRESS THE DAMN TOPIC.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:05 PM

Maybe he opposes the war now because the strategy, goals and intelligence are different than when he voted for it? Just an idea.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:05 PM

10:03 Oh God, her she's goes again, trying to answer Biden's huge experience with her "It's obvious that I'm a Washington outsider" shit. Gimme a break, governor. If you're going to whine that you can't equal Biden's experience by regurgitating that excuse all night, then maybe you could've thought twice about accepting a position on this ticket.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:06 PM

"Man, I'm such a Washington outsider."

I'm not objective. I just don't like her on a personal level.

Posted by: Erik at October 2, 2008 10:06 PM

I think Biden is doing a good job presenting his point without hammering the obvious, like when he went to Sudan, he didn't go "and when have you been to Sudan?" to Palin.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:06 PM

"Nucular" is no more part of a dialect than "axing" someone a question. If you know the correct pronunciation and still can't be bothered to say it correctly, you're showing both laziness and contempt for the importance of communication, an attitude which usually passes on to the next generation in more prominent ways.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:06 PM

Is it just me or does she still sound like she's giving answers in the Miss Alaska contest?

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:06 PM

Bosnians? You mean James Bond? What does he have to do with our foreign policy?

Posted by: Christine at October 2, 2008 10:07 PM

"lock step" nice word choice...

Heh, she is depending on the pundits for the truth?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:07 PM

"John McCain knows how to win a war."

Talk about the Straight Line Express.

Posted by: aer at October 2, 2008 10:07 PM

The Obama camp needs to get James Garner's endorsement. "Mccain is no Maverick"

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:08 PM

"Jon McCain knows how to win a war."

Really? Which one has he won?

(and watching Return of the Jedi doesn't count)

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:08 PM

When has John McCain won a war?

Posted by: BBOvenGuy at October 2, 2008 10:08 PM

Palin says she watched Biden's previous debates.

What she doesn't say is that she watched them yesterday... :-)

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:09 PM

Biden explained that he was against the war. Palin's response? Filibuster. Talk about all the politics stuff that's going to happen in the next few days but don't actually say anything to prove that he was for the war, just imply it.

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 10:10 PM

You cannot call yourself a maverick if you are the maverick!

R-

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:10 PM

"John McCain knows how to win a war."

Bullshit. He was in a war. That means nothing really. I'm a cop, that doesn't mean I know how to stop or end all crime. Tell us a solid F'N plan you dizzy &*%&#&* or go back to F'N Alaska already.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:11 PM

Is there anyone left in the US who doesn't know there's a town in Alaska called Wasilla?

Posted by: Erik at October 2, 2008 10:11 PM

Why does Biden seem to be talking like he's part of a team and Palin seem to be talking like she's campaigning for John McCain?

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:12 PM

10:09 "What do you expect, [we're] a team of mavericks". Wrong, governor. McCain was a maverick. He's not anymore. He's part of the system, and you're incompetent.

10:10 Wasilia Main Street. My God, does she have no concept that people are going to be watching for canned soundbites.

And now "working-class Americans". Hmph. Guess not.

10:11 And now Biden is countering by repeating it or using similar phrases. Well, at least he's just trying to turn the left hook of her use of it into a left jab by co-opting it.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:12 PM

I wonder if Biden watches the Office.

Posted by: Christine at October 2, 2008 10:12 PM

Y'know... enough with the fracking "greed on Wall Street"

You know. I've always thought that the choice of VP would swing my vote. Now it has... I cannot bear the thought of her being so close to that much power.

Dagnabit...

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:12 PM

I think it's possible that she could be so annoying that the general public might start to hate her.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

"Her reward is in Heaven."

Posted by: Jacob at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

"Say it isn't so, Joe, doggone it..."

THE BRAIN, IT HURTS.

Posted by: Delmo Walters Jr. at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Say it ain't so? There you go again? Does she think she's Reagan?

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Palin: DC needs a bit of Wasilla.

Does that mean you would massively increase the debt while spending tons of money on things we don't need?

Oh, and Biden spends a lot of time in Home Depot? Weird name drop. Might be true, but that feels a little forced.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

10:11 Another "There you go again" (Who is she, Reagan?), "doggonnit", and "God bless her". I hadn't noticed what Tim and others were talking about before, but now I am, and I swear, I wanna kill her if she doesn't stop it with the homeyisms.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Oh. My. God.

I think she might actually get a lot of teacher's votes. She admits that No Child Left Behind is crap.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Did Palin really just make a reference to Biden's dead wife? Isn't that kind of ... um ... tacky?

Okay, and the shout-out to third-grades is just goofy. I'd give a shout-out to my students if I were on Who Wants to be a Millionaire, but not in a debate.

How the hell did things steer to education anyway?

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Oh my god she just brought up his dead wife.

That's hard.

and she's gone so folksy I can hear the banjoes

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:13 PM

Oh. My. God.

I think she might actually get a lot of teacher's votes. She admits that No Child Left Behind is crap.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:14 PM

This is awful.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:15 PM

Yes! I just need a 9-11 or job creation now to win!

Posted by: critter42 at October 2, 2008 10:15 PM

"but willful ignorance of the English language is something that I really cannot abide"

So you just refuse to accept that there can be localized development of alternate pronunciations in an active, evolving language (ie a *dialect*) that has absolutely nothing to do with willful ignorance or stupidity, is that it? Talk about your close-mindedness.

"If that's what annoys you the most in the last eight years, then I respectfully submit that you haven't been paying much attention."

And I respectfully submit that statement's full of crap. I said "Annoyed". "Annoyed" is not the same as "Disturbed", "Scared", "Angered", or any of a thousand other emotions this administration has engendered.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:15 PM

10:13 Public school is "near and dear to my heart". Sure, governor. But not all subjects, right? There are certain ones that you'd rather kids not learn, right?

Peter David: 10:07: John McCain knows how to win a war. Which war has he won, exactly?
Luigi Novi: Vietnam, Peter. Don't you know that getting your plane shot down, being captured and tortured is how wars are won?

(In the George Patton bizarro world, that is.)

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:15 PM

There it is!

She just wrote the SNL sketch for this debate.

"Say it ain't so, there you go again Joe, doggone it, [fast, endless rambling]."

Too bad the people at home have probably tuned out by now.

Posted by: Daddy G. at October 2, 2008 10:15 PM

Washington Post Fact-Checker blog is covering the debate live as well, just as they did the prior Presidential debate.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:16 PM

Did she say hockey mom ever? or just soccer mom?

so close to a bingo

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:17 PM

Great question from Ifill.

"Flexibility"!!! Get 'er Joe.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:17 PM

Got Executive now. She's starting to hit a lot more of these now.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:17 PM

Got Executive now. She's starting to hit a lot more of these now.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:17 PM

Got Executive now. She's starting to hit a lot more of these now.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:18 PM

Got Executive now. She's starting to hit a lot more of these now.

Posted by: erik at October 2, 2008 10:18 PM

I thought John McCain was never tortured...

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:19 PM

Critter, this is a stupid argument. I dislike the term "nucular" intensely, and I have explained why. Matt Adler did it even better.

You want to disagree, that's your business -- but frankly, you're being both a bore and a boor, so I'm withdrawing from this particular non-debate. Feel free to take that personally as well if you like.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:19 PM

Biden shoots and scores on the VP office! To bad that it will be one of those issues that fall flat with most people.

Palin doesn't even know the basic structure of government. Jeez...

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:19 PM

YOOOOOO JOE!

*cheering*

I wish he had addressed her flexibility comment directly and chided her on it. It's risky, but this the prospect of another administration shredding the Consitution has to be addressed.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:20 PM

Biden Just Nailed her on the VP question.

A huge state with a population lower than many major cities.

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 10:20 PM

Does anybody else hear dueling banjoes in the background?!?

R-

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:20 PM

Got executive and heartland. She's starting to hit more of these.

Has she said "job creation" or "reformer" yet?

Posted by: Erik at October 2, 2008 10:20 PM

I think her weak point was just proven. She can't answer a question as it was asked.

Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 10:20 PM

10:19 Okay now she sounds like a preacher trying to make you swallow something really stupid, like witchcraft exists. Gag me! I loathe this woman.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:21 PM

The only solid concept she's put forward is the notion that she's just like the common folk out there. Too bad for her that most the common folk out there have more brains than she does.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:22 PM

"For God's sake, just say No, of course not, that the vice presidency is under the exec branch! Jeez!"

No, he had to make a direct reference to the Constituion. We need to hear this now more than ever.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:22 PM

10:21 More "maverick" and "not more of the same" from Palin.

Posted by: Rich at October 2, 2008 10:23 PM

She said Giuliani. I think that counts for 9/11, bingo crowd.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:23 PM

"stupid, like witchcraft exists. "

It does. Just ask her preacher.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:23 PM

Can we get a bingo if she says Maverick 5 times in the same sentence?

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 10:23 PM

She said LEAVE ... that was funny!

R-

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:24 PM

And now Biden's taking on the "maverick" cliche directly.

Go for it, Joe!

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:24 PM

Gwen asked them what their Achilles heals are. That seems like a bad question to me. Who's going to give a real answer to that when running for such an important office?

At this point, they're going to tell you that they can balance the budget, make peace with any world leader, and protect Metropolis from giant crystal robots.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:24 PM

Good. Biden's finally calling on the maverick crap.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:24 PM

"He's been no maverick in the things that matter in people's lives." Excellent line. Taking down her central talking point.

Posted by: Christine at October 2, 2008 10:24 PM

Oooooh... Look at him go on the "Maverick" ... Nice.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:25 PM

10:22: Did I hear that right? "He's the man we need to leave, I mean lead."

Yes, you did.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:25 PM

PALINGO!

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:25 PM

10:23 Good! Biden debunked her "maverick" soundbite.

Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:26 PM

10:22: Did I hear that right? "He's the man we need to leave, I mean lead."

Yes she said that.

Posted by: Richard Renteria at October 2, 2008 10:26 PM

This debate far exceeded my expectations of Biden. He did a great job tonight connecting McCain to Bush and questioning his "Maverick" label.

R-

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:27 PM

10:24: He's killing her. Biden's freaking killing her.

Which will be played up as his being a bully in Friday's talking points.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:28 PM
Gwen asked them what their Achilles heals are. That seems like a bad question to me. Who's going to give a real answer to that when running for such an important office?

A lot of job-interview-like questions are bad debate questions, but I think the public is entitled to hear the candidates respond to those kinds of questions.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:29 PM

The "motive" bit by Joe was weak as hell. That's going to be used to smack the hell out of him this weekend.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:29 PM

Which will be played up as his being a bully in Friday's talking points.

I don't think so -- not successfully, anyway. He's been very careful to stay on the right side of that emotional line.


Posted by: jasonk at October 2, 2008 10:29 PM

I would love to know how many democrats and independents she's posted to positions

Posted by: Jacob at October 2, 2008 10:29 PM

She has a diverse family, and some of her best friends are gay.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:30 PM

"I like to answer the tough questions."

Okay, so why didn't you?

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:31 PM

How was that weak, Jerry? I actually thought it was one of the most insightful things either of them had said all evening.

Posted by: critter42 at October 2, 2008 10:31 PM

""Nucular" is no more part of a dialect than "axing" someone a question. If you know the correct pronunciation and still can't be bothered to say it correctly, you're showing both laziness and contempt for the importance of communication, an attitude which usually passes on to the next generation in more prominent ways."

mmm...that would be such a lovely statement if it were true. However, you are completely wrong. If that were true then I guess I should be a drooling, ignorant stooge who spends 90% of his life glued to the idiot tube. That is most decidedly not the case. My grandmother and grandfather and my mother pronounced it that way while I was growing up and they were NOT lazy, ignorant or contemptuous - and neither am I thanks to them. So, I must ask you for an apology on their behalf.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:31 PM

""I like to answer these tough questions."

Really? When did you do that, Sarah?

10:28: Holy crap. We have 204 comments on this thread. That's more than twice as much on the presidential debate.

Because comedy always plays better.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 2, 2008 10:32 PM

Ha! Palin didn't appoint people on a non-partisan basis, she appointed them based on whether or not they were her friends!

Oh, great. Media bashing. Never mind the fact that the American People wouldn't be able to hear a word she's saying without the media.

Posted by: Jonny McGarrigle at October 2, 2008 10:32 PM

Her closing statement was simply hilarious

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:32 PM

I say we got 204 because of the bingo. I've probably made 15-20 posts, and I think the bingo helped. I got depressed part way through the first one, but the card kept me going.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:32 PM

She took five week to come up with that closing for her debate?

Posted by: Daddy G. at October 2, 2008 10:32 PM

The folks at the FactCheck.org Wire appear to have gotten their live coverage up and running for this debate (they had technical diffculties for the first Presidential debate which aborted their plan to do so then).

Posted by: Brian at October 2, 2008 10:33 PM

What questions did she actually answer? I forget... Let alone tough!

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:33 PM

Peter David: 10:21: I know he didn't do it manipulatively, but his choking up just now is going to floor people. That was perfect. Very emotional and he managed to rein himself in just in time so that he will come across as strong.
Luigi Novi: He also coughed or cleared his throat in a wide shot about an hour ago, when Palin was speaking, so unless he deliberately did that as a plant, yeah, it was not deliberate.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:33 PM

Much better closing statement from Biden.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:34 PM

"How was that weak, Jerry? I actually thought it was one of the most insightful things either of them had said all evening."

It could have been, Tim, but the way it was delivered came off flat to me. It seemed weak and hollow. It may be because I'm hearing the debate and not watching it and I'm not getting the added effects of the visual.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:35 PM

Monet 08' dammit.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 10:36 PM

Maybe; I've certainly noticed a "listened vs. watched" difference in past years.

In any case, now back to the Grading Monster. 'Night, all.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:36 PM

Also, I say we got to 204 because I wanted to see Palin speak. I've seen Obama, McCain and Biden before, but I haven't seen Palin attempt anything close to a debate.

Posted by: Mike at October 2, 2008 10:36 PM

I think Palin lost 15 electoral points just from letting people forget McCain was a prisoner of war.

Posted by: David at October 2, 2008 10:37 PM

Also, I say we got to 204 because more people wanted to see Palin speak. I've seen Obama, McCain and Biden before, but I (and probably other viewers who tuned in for this debate) haven't seen Palin attempt anything close to a debate.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:37 PM

Biden did pulloff the better closing argument. I'm tuning into Fox News now on the XM. I gotta hear how they spin this as a win for Palin.

Heh, they just said that Palin didn't make a single mistake.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:38 PM

Night, Tim.

Posted by: critter42 at October 2, 2008 10:39 PM

"so I'm withdrawing from this particular non-debate"

See, this is what I don't get. Something is harped on continuously for eight years, is mentioned specifically in the live blogging - I mention my annoyance with that statement, then refute your argument, so now I'm a bore and boor and you withdraw from the 'non-debate'. Just sayin'

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:41 PM

10:38 PM - Fox News:

Palin held her own and maybe even won. She didn't make any mistakes. She was perfect. She was great. She's going to fire up the base all over again based on this debate. At 9:55 PM she "won" the debate.

I wish I could see their faces while they're saying that.

Posted by: critter42 at October 2, 2008 10:42 PM

From MSNBC:
"Palin pushes wedge between Biden and Obama"

ARRRRGGGHHHHH

And whoever wrote the article is either a) a Palin supporter or b) watched some other debate

Posted by: Peter David at October 2, 2008 10:47 PM

The PBS commentary continues to be genuinely fair and balanced, including making a lot of the same comments that I and others have been making.

PAD

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:47 PM

Right now on CNN, Soyedad O'Brien is interviewing a group of (IIUC) registered independents, Republicans and Democrats Ohio. There's about twenty to thirty of them in total, and she started off with a show of hands, and most of them said Biden won. About three or four raised their hands in support of Palin.

Posted by: Nivek at October 2, 2008 10:48 PM

Pat Buchanan on MSNBC just said she won the Debate. WTF kind of junk did he get off Rush to make him Hallucinate that hard? She just said she wanted to continue to expand her power as Vice President! NO ONE BETTER LET WILMA FLINTSTONE NEAR THOSE NUKES!

Posted by: Erik at October 2, 2008 10:49 PM

This is starting to remind me of Quayle in 1988. As long as Palin didn't swallow her own tongue, she has exceeded expectations.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:50 PM

One of the panelists who says she'll vote for Palin describes her rationale by saying that Palin is a "real person", and so forth. Sure. And Obama and Biden are made of paper mache.

Posted by: Matt Adler at October 2, 2008 10:51 PM

The only thing Biden could have done better is shown more energy throughout the debate. On substance, there was no comparison. Anyone who think this woman belongs in the White House is a fool.

Posted by: Peter David at October 2, 2008 10:54 PM

On PBS they just said, "It will be some time before we know if she was likeably Reaganesque or just 'Gidget Goes to Washington.'" That's priceless.

PAD

Posted by: Kevin at October 2, 2008 10:54 PM

A note to Sarah Palin: It's Gen. David McKiernan in Afghanistan, not Gen. George McClellan.... You're a few years off there.

Posted by: Nivek at October 2, 2008 10:55 PM

I hope no one lets that comment about expanding Vice-Presidential powers drop. That definatly sent a cold chill down my spine!

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 10:59 PM

Right now on CNN, Soyedad O'Brien is interviewing a group of (IIUC) registered independents, Republicans and Democrats Ohio. There's about twenty to thirty of them in total, and she started off with a show of hands, and most of them said Biden won. About three or four raised their hands in support of Palin.

Fox did the same thing and got a huge show of hands for Palin. However, based on the footage of the diner spot that Fox News did; I'm not sure I can trust what they say about a show of hands without actually being able to see it.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at October 2, 2008 10:59 PM

I noticed that too, but didn't think much of it. She mentioned "McClellan", and I thought, Wait, that's the former WH press secretary. They're supposed to be talking about Iraq commanders. Is there a commander in Iraq that also has that name?

Posted by: Thacher E Cleveland at October 2, 2008 11:01 PM

I love how he got her to agree with Cheney. How do you agree Cheney?!?!

Posted by: J. Alexander at October 2, 2008 11:07 PM

Hmmm. She may have won the debate for just not collapsing on stage, but did she do anything to convince voters who were undecided. I doubt it.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 11:13 PM

One of the panelists who says she'll vote for Palin describes her rationale by saying that Palin is a "real person", and so forth.

I just had that talk with a co-worker. He heard the debate and said that Palin won it because she's more real tham Biden or Obama. I asked him what he meant and he said that she just comes off as more of a regular person.

Of course, he and others said the same thing eight years ago about Bush and we all know how well that turned out...

Posted by: rnmkr47 at October 2, 2008 11:14 PM

NBC was also saying that Palin did well and both of them won. I was leaning McCain-Palin but I don't think there's any way anyone can say that Biden didn't win and handily.
I got annoyed with the back and forth over who did or didn't want to withhold funding for the troops. As I understand it, Obama voted against it because he disagreed with the way the administration was handling the war and McCain voted against it because there was a timetable in it. If either had voted for it, they would have been nailed for voting for something that went against their previous positions. So it's a non-issue to me.
There's a guy who legally changed his name to Santa Claus and is running as an official write-in in 15 states to raise awareness for rpoblems affecting children. I hope he's official in Ohio so maybe I can vote for him. There's aspects of both sides I like and dislike and it's hard to sort the sound bites and posturing from reality. And probably some of the biggest issues of the presidency in the next four years wil bethings no one's arguing about now anyway. Oh well, a couple more weeks to decide I guess...

Posted by: Red Monster at October 2, 2008 11:15 PM

I, too, had a moment of internal laughter when Gov. Palin gave us that, "I'm not going to answer the questions the way you want me to" line, oh that sneaky wench.

Answer the questions, Governor!

*ahem* Sorry. Neither of them gave a particularly gutsy answer about gay marriage, but Sen. Biden's was by far the stronger of two spineless. Sorry, Governor, but "tolerance" just doesn't cut it.

Pointing backward to the past is called learning from our history, Governor. It may not be entirely convenient for your ticket, but it's actually quite a noble endeavor.

Oh, and, it's a superficial point, but her saying "nucular" grated my nerves, too. I speak an entirely different regional accent and dialect from Palin, and I've heard my friends occasionally say "nucular" in quick-flowing conversation, but she says "nucular" even when she's enunciating. It's like she's trying to *insist* that it's pronounced "nucular." Oy, I was just thinking earlier today that Gov. Palin is the new GW Bush: every time I see a picture of her, she looks dumber. This "nucular" pronunciation just drives it home. I was also rather amused (read: self-righteous) when she misused "attribute" and abused the word "impact," so maybe that's just my English Major soul rearing its snarky head.

Moreover, am I the only one who's rather annoyed at how much she talks about Alaska? Sen. Biden sometimes talks about Delaware and Pennsylvania, but his MO is very different. When Gov. Palin brings up Alaska...I'm not even entirely sure what she's trying to accomplish, except for sometimes when she shamelessly exploits the culture wars with her, "Look at me, I'm a hockey mom!" spiel and the East Coast/flyover divide. I'm especially annoyed with the way she talks about Washington. She thinks we need good people from Wasilla over here to show us how ordinary Americans live? Has it not occurred to her that plenty of ordinary Americans grow up and live in and near Washington DC? Does she think Washingtonians don't "sit around the kitchen table"? Has she even been here yet?

Sorry, had to get that out of the way. Overall, I'm disappointed with the debate. I think Biden gave the better answers, but in terms of delivery, Palin held her own very well. That shouldn't really matter in how the debate is perceived, but really, it kind of does come into the picture. I wanted to see some carnage, and Sen. Biden was way too polite. He should have said more about VAWA, in contrast to Gov. Palin's (pathetic) record on women's rights, but the format didn't give him a chance. I wanted to see him ask her, "You keep talking about how cutting taxes will create jobs, but what kind of history do you base that on?" He was totally spot-on in pointing out that he knows what it's like to be a single parent, and struggle to take care of his family, and that he knows tragedy. Good on him, to remind us that he's a man *and* he knows what it's like to be on his own with a struggling family. But he should have cornered her more.

Posted by: JamesLynch at October 2, 2008 11:20 PM

As a big supporter of gay marriage, I'm disappointed that both candidates said they opposed gay marriage (leaving it "up to indivudual faiths" sounds nice, but they still have to be recognized by the government for benefits) but heartened that they both support civil unions. Of course, they both dodged a bullet since they weren't asked about, or brought up, gay couples adopting/having children.

And while I stopped watching at 10:00, to me the most telling difference was when discussing Israel. Biden provided very specific, detailed examples of how the Bush policy made the Middle East significantly worse. Palin responded with a very generic criticism about how Democrats were always looking back, then said that Bush's policies worked great without offering anything specific to support it.

Posted by: Red Monster at October 2, 2008 11:23 PM

PS: I loved the part where she said "leave" instead of "lead"!

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 11:27 PM

Rudy Giuliani, Fox News @ 11:23PM:

She did better in this debate than anyone he's ever seen in a debate. He isn't on any drugs we should be making the NYPD aware of, is he?

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 11:36 PM

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26995439?GT1=43001

Who won the VP debate? * 262895 responses

Joe Biden
53%

Sarah Palin
37%

Tie
4.5%

Not sure
5.5%

Not a scientific survey. Click to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 2, 2008 11:45 PM

Joe Lieberman and Hannity are now have orgasms telling each other how great Palin was and how masterfully she won that debate. Joe Lieberman really needs to just change that letter to in front of his name to an "R" and get it over with.

Posted by: mike weber at October 2, 2008 11:57 PM

Posted by: critter42

Let me lay my cards on the table. I am *more* than well aware of the "correct" pronunciation of the word. I was in the Nuclear Navy. I went to Naval Nuclear Power School. I was a Nuclear-qualified Electrician's Mate. My best friend from the Navy still works at a nuclear power plant. We both still (and many of the people we went to power school with, especially from the south and west) pronounce it "nucular" - it is part of our dialect. If you think it makes me sound stupid, eff you.

And the former Naval officer whose pronunciation of it that way first brought it to the public attention helped create the freakin' school.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 2, 2008 09:59 PM

Jiminy Christmas - would people just lay the eff off of this?

No.

I'm not saying it's the most important thing in the world, but willful ignorance of the English language is something that I really cannot abide.

If that's what annoys you the most in the last eight years, then I respectfully submit that you haven't been paying much attention.

I have to agree. So why does it bug you so much?

Posted by: David

Maybe he opposes the war now because the strategy, goals and intelligence are different than when he voted for it? Just an idea.

Except that they aren't - or, rather, the strategy and goals are still as completely udefined as they ever were, and intelligence is still completely lacking.

Posted by: Matt Adler

"Nucular" is no more part of a dialect than "axing" someone a question. If you know the correct pronunciation and still can't be bothered to say it correctly, you're showing both laziness and contempt for the importance of communication, an attitude which usually passes on to the next generation in more prominent ways.

They are *precisely* part of a dialect - and if you can't accept that, then i and my Yat friends and our friends from the Nint' Wawd suggest that, perhaps, you should stay home where such things will not offend your tender sensibilities...

Posted by: Jerry Chandler

Is it just me or does she still sound like she's giving answers in the Miss Alaska contest?

ITYM "Miss South Carolina".

Posted by: Red Monster

...am I the only one who's rather annoyed at how much she talks about Alaska? Sen. Biden sometimes talks about Delaware and Pennsylvania, but his MO is very different. When Gov. Palin brings up Alaska...I'm not even entirely sure what she's trying to accomplish, except for sometimes when she shamelessly exploits the culture wars with her, "Look at me, I'm a hockey mom!" spiel and the East Coast/flyover divide.

What would you? Alaska (hah, got it right) is all she *has*.

Posted by: James Tichy at October 3, 2008 12:02 AM

MSNBC's poll results? Come on, lowest ratings of any of the major cable news networks and only watched by liberals. Are we supposed to be surprised that most democrats think Biden won?

Hey, look, DrudgeReport.com:

Palin 72% 114,130

Biden 26% 40,995

Neither 2% 2,871

Now I'll go see if RushLimbauh.com has a poll...

Posted by: Terry at October 3, 2008 12:32 AM

As Tom Brokaw said, "The Democrats are glad there is only one vice presidential debate."

She kicked his ***

Posted by: Lee Houston, Junior at October 3, 2008 12:39 AM

Am I the only one wondering why Palin seemed to blink on quite a regular basis during the debate?
It was almost like she was sending out coded messages or something.

Posted by: KarenBoe at October 3, 2008 12:44 AM

CNN vote of debate watchers: Biden 51, Palin 36
CBS poll of undecideds: Biden 46, Palin 21

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 3, 2008 12:45 AM

James,

That was the third poll I mentioned. One was even on Fox. That's just the first one I linked because it was the first one I came across that had a link.

mike weber,

ITYM "Miss South Carolina".

No, I mean Miss Alaska. Palin came in second place at the 1984 Miss Alaska pageant.

Terry,

Did you swipe some of Rush's drugs again?

Posted by: mike weber at October 3, 2008 03:01 AM

Posted by Jerry Chandler

mike weber,

ITYM "Miss South Carolina".

No, I mean Miss Alaska. Palin came in second place at the 1984 Miss Alaska pageant.

Yeah; i know. But remember last year's Miss SC pageant and the national headlines? And it looks as if i'm not the only one to think of the comparison, judging by this piece in The New Republic i'm not the only one to think of it.

And, here's a cartoon from 1 October that pretty well sums up why some people are rating Palin's performance so unrealistically high.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 3, 2008 06:12 AM

Joe Lieberman really needs to just change that letter to in front of his name to an "R" and get it over with.

Oh, it'll happen. As soon as the new Congress is sworn in with a larger majority in the Senate, I bet he loses his chairmanship.

As for the "nucular" thing -- Mike, I'll answer you because I've had a lot of respect for you and your words here (as opposed to "critter", who apparently flitted over here JUST to complain about this one issue).

It bugs me because, as a physics teacher, I consider precision of language important. Word pronunciation is not the same issue as word choice, to be sure, but I consider them something of a piece.

There also, I think, is a real difference between those who mispronounce something out of initial ignorance and then correct it, and those who stick with a faulty pronunciation after being told repeatedly what the correct pronunciation is. (I know lots of people who learned words by reading them and had no idea how to pronounce them until corrected.)

Primarily, though, I suspect that it's because the same people who are out in the public eye using "nucular" on a regular basis have proven themselves to be slack-jawed idiots on so many OTHER things that a connection's been made in my subconscious.

That was probably a much longer response than this issue really deserves, honestly, but you asked a fair question and I felt it deserved a fair and full answer.

Now, can we all move on from this particular point?

TWL

Posted by: barry miller at October 3, 2008 07:02 AM

it so obvious that she was nothing but a parrot,saying just what her handlers wanted her to say.absolutly nothing original. she coverd all her talking points even if it had nothing to do with the question asked.i was just waiting for someone ,Biden or the moderator to scream please answer the question, it never happened. biden could not do it because he would have been called sexist,picking on the poor little female candidate. Iffel (not sure of the spellig here) couldn't do it because the "problem"with her book was brought up by the McCain campagin. She could be comfrontational as Jim Leher was when he was prodding MCain and Obama last week to look at each other ,or comment that questions were not answered.
what was clear was she still does not know the role of the vice-president. she wants to expand the power and role of the vice-president in congress....coould not belive it...thank god Biden couldn't believe it either! she gave him a great opening to not only teach her a civics lesson on the vice-president's but was able to take a much needed shot at DICK CHEENEY one of the men most responsible for the eroding of civil rights in this post 9/11 world. that was genuine anger from the senator on thatsubject...it was great and about time.
did anyone also notice she doesn't have any achilles heal. probably didn't know what it meant.
finally i gave up on the post debate talk when Pat Buchannan nearly,probably did, wet his pants in telling the msnbc audience how great she did. Even Rachael Maddow was speechless at his response.

Posted by: Susan O at October 3, 2008 07:13 AM

To take it one unnecessary step further, Ebonics: dialect or ignorance?

Calling a Sub sandwich a hoagy is dialect; calling it a hokey is ignorance. Or a hearing impairment, which is forgivable.

Palin is just a smarmy, self-righteous worm trying to chisel into pavement while drowning in the deluge.

I've suffered the soccer mom route x3, the baseball mom x4, even Challengers league. What the hell about being a sports mom makes ANYONE qualified to hold a presidential/VP position? Arrggghhh!

I have lost all faith in the intelligence of this country. Time to buy up land in Montana and form my own compound.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 3, 2008 07:43 AM

"Yeah; i know. But remember last year's Miss SC pageant and the national headlines?"

The SC Teen thing? Yeah, I remember that. I've used that one before when talking about Palin, but I thought that she actually wasn't that bad last night. I just thought that she sounded so canned and I love the world-ish last night that she sounded like she was still doing pagents rather than a debate.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at October 3, 2008 07:45 AM

"To take it one unnecessary step further, Ebonics: dialect or ignorance?"

Ignorance.

This thread's about to get fun.

Posted by: Peter David at October 3, 2008 07:46 AM

As Tom Brokaw said, "The Democrats are glad there is only one vice presidential debate."

True enough, if only because watching Biden mop the floor with her a second time could be borderline painful.

She kicked his ***

In fantasy land, perhaps. Not by any realistic measure.

PAD

Posted by: The StarWolf at October 3, 2008 07:49 AM

David (who's not PAD) - That Bridge to Nowhere line was pure pwnage.

What? And people complain about "nucular"?!

Posted by: The StarWolf at October 3, 2008 07:51 AM

Even here, in Canada, a Montreal French-language TV station's news clip mentioned that, according to them, observers had given Palin good points on the debate. Clearly something got lost in translation.

Posted by: Bladestar at October 3, 2008 07:55 AM

Palin "won" the debate in exactly the same way the last place finisher in a Special Olympics event is a "winner".

She had the courage to get out there and try, but she was totally outclassed...

Posted by: Micha at October 3, 2008 08:40 AM

"One of the panelists who says she'll vote for Palin describes her rationale by saying that Palin is a "real person", and so forth.

I just had that talk with a co-worker. He heard the debate and said that Palin won it because she's more real tham Biden or Obama. I asked him what he meant and he said that she just comes off as more of a regular person."

That makes sense. Nobody wants a synthetic person, android, cyborg, cylon, super computer or clone at he white house.

"Yeah, what does McCain have against Spain?"

Spanish-American war. He still holds a grudge. Remember the Maine.

Posted by: Red Monster at October 3, 2008 08:53 AM

Well, at this point McCain's got no business complaining about how the debate was carried out. Ifill was entirely fair to both candidates and Biden practically bent over backwards to play nice with Palin. She appeared very confident and if McCain is unhappy with her performance in terms of the substance of her answers, he has no one to blame but the both of them.

Okay, time to 'fess up, everyone. Who else is disappointed that Biden was so damned polite with Palin? I wanted to see him in attack dog mode. I know that's not what he was "supposed" to do in order to appeal to the undecideds, but it's what I wanted to see.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at October 3, 2008 09:16 AM

Spanish-American war. He still holds a grudge. Remember the Maine.

That would explain Palin's references to General McClellan -- maybe McCain's war experiences go further back than we thought?

Posted by: Mike at October 3, 2008 09:30 AM
To take it one unnecessary step further, Ebonics: dialect or ignorance?

Ignorance.

No word is interchangeable with the thing it represents. It's an ignorance to the inherent deadness of language to think the words you use are somehow more faithful than the varying words others use to refer to the same thing.

Look through a copy of Baker's Nat Turner. Mismanaging the intimacy of their communications got black abolitionists killed. That's ignorance, too.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 3, 2008 10:00 AM

Red Monster: Okay, time to 'fess up, everyone. Who else is disappointed that Biden was so damned polite with Palin?

Not me, I thought he was perfect. We don't need weeks of headlines about the McCain camp calling Biden sexist. We need this to fade away with the majority of people acknowledging that Biden did a better job.

It's like diplomacy. Would it be satisfying to see our leaders yell at Kim Jong il and berate him for doing such a horrible job with North Korea? Yes, that would be great to watch. However, it would make things worse instead of better. It may be satisfying to insult, but being polite and intelligent is how our leaders defuse a situation and make progress. The fact that Biden was polite in the situation is part of what makes me want to vote for him and Obama.

Posted by: Rob Brown at October 3, 2008 10:30 AM

There's something that I wondered about. There are a lot of comments here and I'm afraid I can't go through them all to see if somebody's mentioned this already, so if somebody has I apologize for going over old ground.

Here it is: Palin said that a McCain administration wouldn't do anything to prohibit visitation in hospitals for same-sex couples. But the problem, as I understand it, is that right now the status quo DOES prohibit anybody who isn't family from seeing a patient. Same-sex partners are not considered family.

So for Palin to say "we won't do anything to prohibit it" means nothing. It's already prohibited. The question is whether or not a McCain administration would do anything to change that, or whether they would just ignore the problem.

9:38: Well, that's a damned shame that they don't support that. Makes him no better than Palin.

It's unfortunate, yes. The thing is that this is the answer politicians on both sides of the aisle would give if you asked them about same-sex marriage. Kerry and Edwards, you might recall, both supported civil unions, but they weren't comfortable with those unions being called "marriages." That's better than nothing, but it's really not good enough. As MightyGodKing said not that long ago in the comments section of one of his posts:

"In a moral sense, calling it anything but marriage is enforcing a separate-but-equal doctrine, which may be easier to implement but on a moral level is profoundly insulting. (”Gays can’t get married. That’s for straight people. Gays can get civilly unioned.”) Given the level of disassociation and ostricization that many gay people have to accept simply to live their lives and how that alienation in turn affects their mental health, endorsing it with the language of the state is simply mendacious."

Posted by: Susan O at October 3, 2008 10:57 AM

Ok, so if I read all these headlines right, Palin comes out ahead because, for her, a "tie is a win".

Huh?

You mean public expectation of her is so low that she doesn't need to be rational or inspirational, she just needs to stand up and speak without crying or breaking a nail (or answering a question) and that makes her a winner? This makes her a good potential President? That when Hezbollah tells her to go home and bake cookies, she won't stutter, but tell them she's um, a maverick hockey-mom, gosh darn it?

Well, at least her lipstick was on straight.

Where oh where are you, Hillary, swinging your designer bag of testicles and pecking your opponents to death with your sharp beak? At least you can speak without a teleprompter.

Posted by: Charlie E at October 3, 2008 11:37 AM

Hi All,
Ok, on the blinking. I was watching on CNNHD (the only HD channel that I can find quickly carrying the debate...) and the problem was her hair. They needed to cut her bangs back a little more, she had hair in her eyes and it was bothering her. She finally got it out her eyes after about 15 minutes.

Second NUCULAR is an ACCEPTED pronunciation for nuclear. I know that some don't like it, but it was what I always said. Now, while I am not a nuclear engineer, I am an electrical engineer with a MS:ECE, so it isn't education level. It just depends on where you picked it up. I think I did in all those 'B' movies from the 50's and 60's!

Finally, I kept hoping EITHER candidate would actually answer the question that was asked. Both kept going to what ever canned answer they had prepared rather than addressing the question. My favorite evasion was when Biden was asked what promises he would not be able to keep, and went into a tirade about Bush policies that they would not keep. I kept shouting at the screen "So, when did YOU promise to do THAT!"

Posted by: Nivek at October 3, 2008 11:52 AM

I'm getting very frustrated that so far the media isn't digging into that expanded VP Powers comment Palin blurted out. That's dangerous given that we have Cheney in Office dictating policy and making up powers and saying he can make up facts about invading a country. And Palin wants more? Hell no. Any self respecting American should say hell no as well.

Posted by: Rob Brown at October 3, 2008 11:52 AM

Finally, I kept hoping EITHER candidate would actually answer the question that was asked. Both kept going to what ever canned answer they had prepared rather than addressing the question.

Palin did it more. A LOT more.

You mean public expectation of her is so low that she doesn't need to be rational or inspirational, she just needs to stand up and speak without crying or breaking a nail (or answering a question) and that makes her a winner?

Well, most of the pundits on CNN last night didn't feel Palin "won", but they felt that she had improved her public image because she sounded better than she did with Couric.

I'm gonna copy and paste something I posted elsewhere now. Here it is:

Palin closed by saying that she wanted to talk directly to the people without the "filter" of the mainstream media.

By Palin's definition, talking directly to the people means blathering on about whatever the hell you feel like talking about while ignoring the question that's been posed to you. She wasn't able to do that with Couric. She had somebody asking her about specific things, and she wasn't able to give non-sequitur answers without looking bad. So she floundered.

I prefer somebody who is willing to have a dialogue, who is willing to answer any and all questions posed to him or her. I would be interested to see how well Palin would have been able to handle herself if the format were different, if Ifill said at any point "You didn't answer the question. Please answer the question before we move on."

Or if Ifill had the authority to just cut off a candidate's mike if she or he went off-topic. I know that cutting mikes is a Billo move and thus usually a dick move, but Palin would deserve it.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 3, 2008 11:58 AM

One theory I've seen kicked around is that the McCain campaign will now hide her away. Well, more-so.

She did better in this debate than she had been doing in interviews. Why screw that up? If they put her in Cheney's hidden bunker right now, then this debate will be the last thing people remember seeing from her. So they might not let her do any more interviews with real reporters. The occasional FOX News interview, but no real reporters.

Posted by: Craig J. Ries at October 3, 2008 12:13 PM

but they felt that she had improved her public image because she sounded better than she did with Couric.

She could've suddenly come down with Tourette's last night and still sounded better than the interview with Couric.

Posted by: Red Monster at October 3, 2008 12:22 PM

Apropos of nothing except for the guy who chose Gov. Palin as his running mate: have you all seen this story?

I hope it's a hoax, but fear it isn't.

Posted by: Daddy G. at October 3, 2008 12:27 PM

For what it's worth... Post-debate coverage from FactCheck.org and Politifact.com.

My only comment about it all is just that I'm kind of tired of McCain/Palin continually referring to themselves as mavericks. To me that's something that you leave to other people to decide, you can't just bestow it upon yourself. They should at least confine themselves to using it only in reference to each other, but continually saying "I'm a maverick" (instead of the less boastful "I'm known by some as something of a maverick" or even "I've earned a reputation as something of a maverick") just seems wrong to me. It's too short and quick to the point without enough humility. I could be wrong, but that's how I see it and, for me anyway, it's gotten tiresome.

Posted by: Jason M. Bryant at October 3, 2008 12:36 PM

Red Monster, that story sounds very, very fishy. A man who wants to be President saying obviously racist things about his adopted daughter? I smell hoax.

Snopes has an article about this story. They can't prove that it is false, but they have found out that the person it is atributed to didn't write it.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/vacation.asp

Posted by: Red Monster at October 3, 2008 12:40 PM

I found the Snopes page about two minutes after I posted the link.

Posted by: Rob Brown at October 3, 2008 12:51 PM

My only comment about it all is just that I'm kind of tired of McCain/Palin continually referring to themselves as mavericks. To me that's something that you leave to other people to decide, you can't just bestow it upon yourself.

THANK YOU. I was thinking that too.

It's fine if somebody else calls you a maverick, it's even okay if you say "I've been called a maverick", but don't say "I AM a maverick." You even have to be careful with the "I've been called a maverick" thing; repeat it too often, and it gets to sound like bragging.

People usually don't respond well to somebody talking about how great they are. Obama hasn't said he thinks he's great as far as I know. He's talked about what he planned to do, and he's said that the country needed somebody different from George Bush, which is him.

Posted by: Tom Spurgeon at October 3, 2008 01:08 PM

Peter, if you're still keeping track, I think last night's debate fits within that strange West Wing model in that I think I remember what's-his-name on the show starting slow and then finishing strong in his Veep debate, too.

Posted by: Dennis at October 3, 2008 01:15 PM

Red Monster wrote:
"Apropos of nothing except for the guy who chose Gov. Palin as his running mate: have you all seen this story? I hope it's a hoax, but fear it isn't."

LOL… I find it laughable you “fear” that this story might be true. That letter reads like the typical DNC attack/talking points against McCain. It’s a fake but so many of the gullible McCain haters are so desperate to believe such could be true. Dream on…

Posted by: Rob Brown at October 3, 2008 01:20 PM

Something I'd just like to mention here. McCain, and Palin, repeatedly talk about how Ahmadinejad said that Israel should be wiped off the map, or even claim that Ahmadinejad said that Iran was going to wipe Isra