March 08, 2008

The Other Bowlin' Girl

So Ariel asked me to take her to this movie called "The Other Bowlin' Girl, " and how could I resist a film with that title?

Well, I have to say, this film was NOTHING like what I was expecting. It was some sort of lengthy historical thing with Natalie Portman playing a queen, and you can probably guess the ending because it never goes well for Natalie Portman when she plays a queen.

I haven't been this disappointed in a film that I thought was about bowling since I saw "300."

PAD

Posted by Peter David at March 8, 2008 06:44 PM | Other blogs commenting
Comments
Posted by: Will "scifantasy" Frank at March 8, 2008 07:04 PM

A friend of mine is reading over my shoulder, and I think he just broke. Let me reset...

There. I hope you're happy, Peter.

*grin*

Posted by: Bill Mulligan at March 8, 2008 08:23 PM

You should have seen some of the unhappy folks at the premier of Snatch.

The Black Hole wasn't exactly what they expected either...

As for Ariel, go rent Ninja Strike Force or 5 Seconds to Spare

Posted by: Sean at March 8, 2008 08:37 PM

Well, there's one strike against this movie.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at March 8, 2008 08:48 PM

Well, you should probably also not rent Split (1989), Strike! (1998) or The Golden Bowl (1972).

Now, 7-10 Split (2007) may be ok depending on how you view some of the content of the film.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at March 8, 2008 08:49 PM

"Well, there's one strike against this movie."

That could be a really bad pun I you're not in the right frame of mind for it.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at March 8, 2008 09:04 PM

Uhg!

"if you're not"

Posted by: J. Alexander at March 8, 2008 10:34 PM

To take your mind off this why don't you go see a play with Nathan Lane.

Posted by: J. Alexander at March 8, 2008 10:34 PM

To take your mind off this why don't you go see a play with Nathan Lane.

Posted by: Laura at March 8, 2008 10:56 PM

Is Nathan Lane looking for someone to see a play with?

...sorry. >_

Posted by: Joe Nazzaro at March 8, 2008 11:10 PM

How about Kingpin? Bowling For Columbine? Oh never mind, I get it now. NOT about bowling, NOT about bowling...

Posted by: Panda Phil at March 9, 2008 01:46 AM

Oh please spare me...

Posted by: Lothor at March 9, 2008 05:04 AM

[insert funny intro for] Splitz?

How about Jesus Camp? According to Wikipedia, "Rachael...is seen praying over a bowling ball early in the film."

Posted by: Bill at March 9, 2008 09:09 AM

THis reminds me of several years ago when movies were being made from popular board games. Clue and Jumanji were both pretty good, but I never saw any colored dots in Twister.

Posted by: Matt Adler at March 9, 2008 09:17 AM

Having never heard of the movie, it took me a minute to put together the "historical queen" references and get the bowlin'/Boleyn pun. Well played, PAD.

Posted by: campchaos at March 9, 2008 01:46 PM

There's always Mystery Men, probably the best film on bowling I've seen, even though it didn't strike movie goers as that great, and half of them split before the end.

I will hang my head in shame now.

Posted by: Steve Chung at March 9, 2008 02:17 PM

Bowling movies are notoriously hard to pin down for some reason.

How about "Paradise Alley"? :)

Posted by: Kath the Wife at March 9, 2008 04:00 PM

There is a fine bowling movie called League of Ordinary Gentlemen which Peter has talked about on this very blog.

I return to your usual scheduled puns.

PS: I love Mystery Men!

Posted by: Charles F. Waldo at March 9, 2008 04:52 PM

How do you think I felt when I saw this film a few years back called Mystic River, which I thought was about some metaphysical fantasy and instead it's a movie about a Boston Murder with Sean Penn.

Posted by: Mary Ellen Wofford at March 9, 2008 07:34 PM

Ah, Peter, a girl can't bowl for her entire life. It's good to see Ariel has an historial bent! As for 300...They were kind of lined up like bowling pins in their phalanx and they sure as heck looked like they were carrying some...NO I can't make giant bowling balls pun as much as I want too. I just can't.

Posted by: Russ at March 9, 2008 09:49 PM

300 wasn't *that* bad a film.

Posted by: Jerry Chandler at March 9, 2008 11:02 PM

Yeah Mary, try and keep your mind out of the gutter.

Posted by: Neil C, at March 10, 2008 01:14 AM

Reminds me of when I read Catcher in the Rye for the first time in eighth grade because I thought it was going to be about baseball.

Posted by: Tim Lynch at March 10, 2008 06:38 AM

You should have seen some of the unhappy folks at the premier of Snatch.

True story. While I was in college, I was taping ST:TNG somewhat obsessively (big shock, I know). SP speed, 2 shows to a tape. I labeled them with episode titles only, since I knew the series.

One day, our landlord let a couple of workmen into our apartment to fix the compressor.

A few days later, I noticed a tape was missing and wondered what happened to it. The only people we could think of who might have taken it were the workmen in question, but we couldn't figure out why they'd take a single TNG tape and nothing else.

Then we got the phone bill. As long as they were there, they made several calls to phone sex lines.

Suddenly, the titles of the episodes became relevant. They were The Bonding and Booby Trap.

That made losing them worthwhile, just to picture the looks of disappointment on these idiots' faces.

TWL

Posted by: Bob Ahrens at March 11, 2008 09:17 AM

Probably shouldn't show Ariel "The Big Lebowski"... I don't think she could identify with "The Dude".

Posted by: Lothor at March 12, 2008 11:36 AM

"simpsons did it"

...except it wasn't the Simpsons, it was Soap. Burt Campbell liked all musicals, except for Cabin in the Sky; he thought it was going to be about the construction industry. (Burt was in hi-rise construction.)