April 04, 2003

PUT UP OR...

Doug Atkinson said exactly what I was thinking.

See, I was thinking to myself, Hunh. Okay. Here's all these people crabbing (notice I didn't say "bitching") about a marketing hook (which, as Kathleen noted, she actually came up with. All I did was suggest it to DC) but that's all that's happening. Crabbing. So what else could be offered? "Broad Strokes?" "Lady Killers?" And then I thought, Hey. Wait. So many folks here seem to know so much better what will work and what won't.

All right: A marketing hook. Five words or less, preferably, to sell the concept of three titles emphasizing female empowerment, at least one of which has a noir-ish tone to it, and all of which have a more risque slant to them in terms of story matter than the average DC book (although not *quite* as risque as Vertigo.) Oh, and it can't be offensive to any woman anywhere.

Sing out, Louise.

PAD

Posted by Peter David at April 4, 2003 03:11 PM | TrackBack | Other blogs commenting
Comments
Posted by: Ed alexander at April 4, 2003 03:21 PM

Not Just For Men (But They're welcome to watch)!

It's suggestive, therefore bringing in the salacious male readers, but also suggestive that something other than the usual is going on, as well as stating that these books are meant to appeal to women.

Posted by: John Popa at April 4, 2003 03:25 PM

Part of me wants to say 'Ladies In Waiting My Ass' but that's hardly classy.

'These Aren't (Ain't?) Ladies In Waiting' -- nah.

But that's where my brain's pointing right now.

Posted by: Barry at April 4, 2003 03:29 PM

"Ladies' Choice"

Posted by: Malvito at April 4, 2003 03:30 PM

"Let Us Entertain You ..."

No, I'm not serious.

Posted by: Peter David at April 4, 2003 03:30 PM

"Not Just for Men"

Rarely is it a good idea to have marketing hooks that feature negative words such as "not," "isn't," etc. The Oldsmobile ads notwithstanding, it's generally preferable to state what something IS rather than what it ISN'T.

PAD

Posted by: Peter David at April 4, 2003 03:34 PM

"Ladies Choice"

Sounds like a Harlequin romance line. Good angle to take if we want to ensure no male readers.

PAD

Posted by: SPB at April 4, 2003 03:36 PM

"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly."

Posted by: Peter David at April 4, 2003 03:39 PM

"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly"

Not sure how it puts across female empowerment, "ugly" serves to objectify women, and the DC lawyers would be concerned about getting flack from MGM/UA.

PAD

Posted by: Doug at April 4, 2003 03:41 PM

How about:

"Three Titles That Aren't Really Connected In Any Way, Other Than The Fact That They All Have Female Leads, And We Want Your Money"

Posted by: Liberty at April 4, 2003 03:41 PM

I think Marvel already used that one a few years ago for a Punisher - Nomad - Something else I don't remember launch.

Posted by: Corey Tacker at April 4, 2003 03:50 PM

I don't know if this will make sense to anyone other than me but:

"Y the Last Man? Because of Women Like This."

Corey

Posted by: Tom Galloway at April 4, 2003 03:50 PM

Hmm. This'd be easier if I knew something more about the other two books. But it sounds like you want to shoot for the Buffy/Alias/Dark Angel market, so if the other two can be mapped namewise to either Buffy or Alias, you could play off that.

Or how about modifying the Dangerous Curves bit to something like: Comics Noir: Dangerous Curves With An Edge.

Or maybe Wobegon Comics: Where The Women Are Strong. :-)

Posted by: Poe at April 4, 2003 03:57 PM

Taking Back the Night

or

The Night's Been Taken Back.

Posted by: Londo at April 4, 2003 04:01 PM

"Unfair Ladies"

"Dark Angels"

"The Ladies Auxiliary"

"Leading Ladies"

"Ladies First" or "First Ladies"

Posted by: SPB at April 4, 2003 04:04 PM

"The Good" refers to good women or heroines, with an apropriate piece of art work underneath it as thes marketing campaigns ussually include art work.

"The Bad" refers to bad women or your basic villian, again with appropriate art.

"The Ugly" refers not to looks, but to acts, or the ugly or dark side of humanity, with a noir piece of art work to go with it.

Showing women in all three stages shows that they are complete human beings and there is your empowerment angle.

Posted by: Drew at April 4, 2003 04:04 PM

Viva la difference?

Posted by: Kevin T. Brown at April 4, 2003 04:08 PM

And now for something completely different...!

Nahh...

Strong enough for a man, but made for a woman..!

Nahhhhhh....

How about...

3 women

Each with a goal

Each with a secret

Each with a mystery

Each unlike any woman you've ever known

I know, more than the requested 5 words, but not knowing the other 2 projects it wasn't the easiest thing to come up with..!

Posted by: Rick Jones, really at April 4, 2003 04:09 PM

Well, here are a few pittiful efforts. I'll just type the ideas and let them stand or fall, 'cause if you have to explain 'em, they didn't work.

Soft Warriors

Signs of the Times

Curved Steel

Dangerous Diamonds

Dangah, dangah, dangah (Okay, this one is a Steve Irwin reference, but it wasn't to be taken seriously.)

Now, I can't get his voice outta my head. I'll be back when I've exorcised the Crocodile Hunter.

Posted by: Jam at April 4, 2003 04:09 PM

Chicks With Balls.

I'm sure this won't offend anyone.

I mean, who will be offended by the notion of women who play football, baseball and basketball?

No one.

Posted by: Jim at April 4, 2003 04:21 PM

How about

Lady Like

or like your heading

Acting like Ladies

Posted by: Big Lou at April 4, 2003 04:27 PM

"All Chicks -- No D*cks"

Marvel would run it.

Posted by: Chadwick at April 4, 2003 04:31 PM

Dangerous curves sounds right. My sister liked it.

She came up with this (having not seen or read anything about these books):

"Mysterious

Sensual

Dangerous

Catch them."

Posted by: Rick Jones, really at April 4, 2003 04:36 PM

Well, here are a few pittiful efforts. I'll just type the ideas and let them stand or fall, 'cause if you have to explain 'em, they didn't work.

Soft Warriors

Signs of the Times

Curved Steel

Dangerous Diamonds

Dangah, dangah, dangah (Okay, this one is a Steve Irwin reference, but it wasn't to be taken seriously.)

Now, I can't get his voice outta my head. I'll be back when I've exorcised the Crocodile Hunter.

Posted by: Chris Schumacher at April 4, 2003 04:36 PM

No Y About It, XXTreme!

Posted by: Marc Foxx at April 4, 2003 04:46 PM

Howzabout "Underwire, Underfire"?

Posted by: Scott Iskow at April 4, 2003 04:47 PM

I had similar questions/concerns about Crossgen's Meridian. If this was a book that was marketed for women, just what was it about the book that made it "female"? All I really noticed was that the women were more realistically proportioned. Also, the main character's powers were typically female in that they "created," while the evil guy's powers were typically male in that they "destroyed." Meridian's Sephie was obviously set up to be a role model for young ladies, and I really began to question just what made a female role model tick. It's really interesting, for instance, that Sephie's evil opposite is an aggressive, greedy, destructive *man*. How does that define *her* as a character and as a female hero? Shouldn't the ideal female hero *not* be defined by men? Shouldn't there be more to her than that?

So there's all sorts of issues to take into account when you're writing a story for (and featuring) women. But when you're *marketing* a story for women... well, that's different. You might as well say, "Three great titles featuring women!" or something. None of that "Girl Power!" or "Dangerous Curves!" stuff. That's how you market for *men*. Maybe you can flip around--attract the women by alienating the men. It's a risk, and it all depends on just how much you comic book people want women to read the comics. Is it really for women, or is it just something that is "woman-friendly"?

Most of the women comic book fans I know are partial to the anime/manga stuff. If I had to guess, I'd say that women who are inclined to like comic book storytelling are *not* inclined to like superheroes. Hence, the Japanese stuff. Women seem more inclined to read boy's manga than they do American superhero comics, and I believe that's because they offer something besides superheroes. So perhaps you should underplay the superhero element when marketing these books.

Otherwise, I'd say come up with a slogan that has more to do with the themes of each book, rather than the mere superficiality of all of them featuring women. Check out some of the ads featuring male characters. Do they always point out the fact that the characters are male? (Other than the "man" part of most superhero names. BatMAN, Spider-MAN...) Draw attention to what makes the books tick, what makes the stories worth reading. Because if all you're telling me is that the stories feature women that kick butt, I've got Buffy on DVD to satisfy that little craving.

Posted by: Gary Bainbridge at April 4, 2003 04:51 PM

Lovely Pretty Girls? What woman could object to that?

Posted by: Luigi Novi at April 4, 2003 04:54 PM

Barry: "Ladies Choice"

Peter David: Sounds like a Harlequin romance line.

Luigi Novi: Sounds like a feminine deodorant or protection product.

Posted by: Dale Sherman at April 4, 2003 04:54 PM

"Mother, Daughter, Sister, Hero"

Posted by: Dale Sherman at April 4, 2003 04:58 PM

One thing to add to the above -

Although "heroine" would be more accurate (possibly . . . I'm not sure about the content of the books involved), "hero" works with the beat better and could be used in a unisex way, I would think.

Just throwing that out there.

Posted by: Steve Robertson at April 4, 2003 05:08 PM

Here's a few:

Femme Tales

Edge Of The Women's World

Dangerous Mujeres

Femme Extreme

Posted by: Raphael Sutton at April 4, 2003 05:10 PM

I actually have no problem with "Dangerous Curves", it puts me more to mind of the Femmes Fatales of the Forties and Fifties than anything else, and those women were usually just as strong as the men (mentally at least, and sometimes physically as well). Besides, "Dangerous Curves" was my friend's costume this past Halloween and she had a blast with it.

But since PAD asked for suggestions:

"Your mind, your choice"

It ties in to a strong symbol of female empowerment, while also leaving the door open for a campaign encouraging readers (male and female alike) to look for quality (both of story and art) when picking their comics. Plus, we know that at least in "Fallen Angel" the main character will often make momentous choices.

Raphy

Posted by: Scott Rowland at April 4, 2003 05:29 PM

[b]Meridian's Sephie was obviously set up to be a role model for young ladies, and I really began to question just what made a female role model tick. It's really interesting, for instance, that Sephie's evil opposite is an aggressive, greedy, destructive *man*. How does that define *her* as a character and as a female hero? Shouldn't the ideal female hero *not* be defined by men? Shouldn't there be more to her than that?[/b]

I disagree that Sephie is defined by men. Yes, the villain is aggressive, greedy and destructive and the hero is not -- that's often a distinction drawn between hero and villain, regardless of gender. I think the reason Ilahn is a man is because if the character was a woman, it would be perceived as being too much like a fairy tale. I don't really see Ilahn's being a man as being a major part of Sephie's story, though. It's a coming of age story combined with "great power brings great responsibility." The great power in this case really being her leadership role rather than her superpowers.

As for Peter's challenge, I think we all know that it's tough to come up with a slogan that won't offend anyone, but that doesn't negate our concerns. We all want the book to succeed, nobody's throwing stones just to be critical -- well, most people aren't at least.

Posted by: Alex Baker at April 4, 2003 05:41 PM

"More Than Just Boobs..."

"My Eyes Are Up Here, Pig!"

"Ladies of the Night"

More seriously...

"Ladies Choice"

"Comics - Not Just For Men"

"Not The Fairer Sex Anymore"

Posted by: pat at April 4, 2003 05:48 PM

How about “heavenly bodies-sinful action”? That may be a bit too risqué…

Here’s one, "Feme- Fatalities” Too dark maybe?

“Kiss your assumptions goodbye!” Too confrontational???

Well this is fun…I’ll have to think on this some more…

Pat

Posted by: Random Boy at April 4, 2003 05:57 PM

There are three woman right.

This would work for the noir feel book but I am not sure about the other two.

"Manage-a-tois"

It gives the suggestive idea of a threesome without actually saying anything too sexual. To me it seems like this would be the new level of rist these books are taking.

Is this right?

Posted by: Baerbel Haddrell at April 4, 2003 06:08 PM

"female empowerment". Hm, this would fit to all kinds of female heroes, super or otherwise.

It is very difficult to come up with a catch phrase when I know hardly anything about "Fallen Angel" and nothing about the other two new series. From what I know, "Dangerous Curves" might even be accurate if it is indeed about the nowadays usual super slim, super strong (or with other super physical abilities), sexy heroine male readers want to meet in comics.

What interests me is, has this woman a partner, a love interest? What I enjoy is to find a strong female AND male character working together, complementing each other. This attracted me to NF, for example.

A female hero with a difference would be to me someone who is also allowed to *be* female. Are they? I know that you, PAD, can write female characters very well but I don`t know if the same applies to the other two series.

I wish I could think of a different catch phrase but that shouldn`t mean that because I can`t do better I shouldn`t say anything. I think we, the audience, the customers, should be able to say what we think without being told, because we are not also professional writers, painters, whatever, we are not qualified to judge what we bought - or how we feel about certain advertising.

Posted by: Michael Brunner at April 4, 2003 06:31 PM

I know this is off topic, but I wonder how many people heard what Stan Lee's doing:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=797&u=/eo/20030402/en_tv_eo/11554&ncid=762

Posted by: Charles F. Waldo at April 4, 2003 06:33 PM

"Girls' Club"

"For Those Who'll Miss Buffy"

"Velvet Gloves covering Iron Fists"

Oh for crying out loud. Kathleen came up with a good, if slightly overused by the media, name. It doesn't offend me as the only male shiksa in history :) I don't think it'll offend anybody, except probably my cousin, who is a woman, but different strokes for different folks. But I'm tired of being PC all the time. If people get offended, then they get offended, then move on. at least that's what I'd like to hope. Guess I'm naive.

By the by, I don't think the *real* Bendis is homophobic. I wonder how he'd feel if someone was using his name.

Posted by: Bobby Rathbone at April 4, 2003 06:42 PM

Personally, I like dangerous curves, and not cause I wanna objectify woman, I think it pretty much sums up what the linking thread between the three titles will be. (And Mr. David, I laughed out loud at the B5 episode with Delenn's bad hair as did the two ladies I was watching it in my dorm room). We're just being too darn scared of offending people so instead we insult intellegences by saying that people can't get a joke anymore. Anyway, that's a soapbox for another time. Here's my idea for a pitch thread:

"Sugar, Spice and not so Nice."

six words, but it's what I got.

Posted by: Michael Cravens at April 4, 2003 07:07 PM

I've got one:

"Female Persuasion."

Sounds enticingly sexual to men, yet inclusive to women and almost empowering.

Plus, it pretty much sums up the point of the launch in the first place...to persuade females to join the ranks of comics fanboys everywhere! :)

Posted by: Matthew Craig at April 4, 2003 07:24 PM

Um. How about:

* MORE THAN A WOMAN

* ONCE, THERE WERE THREE LITTLE GIRLS...

* AND YOU THOUGHT DC STOOD FOR "DESTINY'S CHILD..."

* FACE IT, TIGER, YOU JUST HIT THE JACKPOT! (heh)

* NOT YOUR FATHER'S SUPERGIRLS!

* WHAT ABOUT THE GIRLS?

* Distaff Comics?

* PERFECT "30"

?

Matt

//\Oo/\\

Posted by: Gary Bainbridge at April 4, 2003 07:28 PM

Vagina-lantes?

Posted by: Random Boy at April 4, 2003 07:57 PM

Not to be a prick (well maybe a bit). Peter has a good point looking at all the tag lines you people have come up with, they are really bad.

I can't believe his line was objected to so much when nobody has a better suggestion.

Posted by: Adam Lima at April 4, 2003 08:02 PM

"Women: Not Just For Breakfast Anymore"

6 words. DAMN!!

"Babes who CAN'T be STOPPED!"

Man, I stink at this.

(Is that the real Bendis, or a nitwit fan doing a lame impersonation?)

Posted by: Ed Alexander at April 4, 2003 08:02 PM

Peter: While it's true that it's a rule that one avoids advertising a product by describing what it isn't, using the word "not" can be quite effective.

"Not Just For Men" works as a double negative and creates an intriquing challenge. "Not for men," would of course be self defeating, but the phrasing "Not Just..." tends towards the inclusive, but without the undesirable effect of disincluding anyone. I honestly think this might work for the books and I'd be glad to cede it to you free of charge.

Posted by: Sputnik Rules at April 4, 2003 08:23 PM

"Once, twice, three times...."

Posted by: Jim Lawless at April 4, 2003 09:11 PM

Leading Ladies

Hell on Heels

Posted by: Charles F. Waldo at April 4, 2003 09:21 PM

Not to be a prick (well maybe a bit). Peter has a good point looking at all the tag lines you people have come up with, they are really bad.

What, nobody likes "Girls' Club?" I'm offended. :)

I can't believe his line was objected to so much when nobody has a better suggestion.

I didn't object to "Dangerous Curves." This whole PC vs. Non-PC stuff started when Elayne Riggs voiced her opinion, and then we had people jumping on the band wagon, and a few people who defended Peter's line of thinking.

Me? I think you can't get to PC, because it does end up offending someone. Think back to that Murphy Brown where the FYI staff (and Scott Bakula as that nice correspondent) were at a lecture about how to be PC and then the Audience started bickering with the staff and themselves.

I do believe that there seems to be an inclination in society for beautiful women to be gravitated towards. But since the job of DC is to make money for comics and try to reach new markets, should we condemn them for appealing to a certain sense of superficialness that society has?

Posted by: Heather at April 4, 2003 09:25 PM

Is that the real Bendis, or a nitwit fan doing a lame impersonation?

The real Bendis couldn't write so poorly if he tried.

How about "Ladies Luck" ?

Posted by: Erhan Kartal at April 4, 2003 09:26 PM

Michael Cravens wrote: " 'Female Persuasion.' "

I like that one the best out of the alternatives (although I liked "Dangerous Curves," too--if forced to take issue, I'd go with "dangerous;" should heroes/heroines be "dangerous"?). It's even a pun!

Posted by: Heather at April 4, 2003 09:27 PM

By the way Jim Lawless, I really dig "Hell on Heels".

Posted by: RW at April 4, 2003 09:32 PM

Howsabout not going genderbased, xcuse me biased at 'll:

"I'll never let you down!"

Posted by: Marketing Man at April 4, 2003 09:40 PM

My turn:

"Sisters doing it for themselves"

"Danger Girls"

"Wonder Women"

"Male superhero fantasy? You wish."

"Beauty, brains and butt-kicking."

"Girl Power Redefined"

Posted by: Steve Leavell at April 4, 2003 09:52 PM

"Heroes in Heels" or "Lady Knights"

Best I've got.

Posted by: Denise Keppel at April 4, 2003 09:54 PM

Heck, as a woman, I think it's great that more comics are even being aimed towards my gender. I've always found it a pity that comics weren't marketed towards women, because they are soaps with more muscles and guns. And, more than that, I'm happy that the writer is a father of four daughters, because I believe I am the feminist that my father raised me to be.

I'm sick of those magazines that scream that a true woman is a vain, self-centered slut. My idea of a woman is someone who is self confident person who is intrested in what is going on in the world, in her community, and her enviroment, one that can be equaly as at home over an engine or a stove.

Rant off...

Dangerous Diamonds

The Power of a Woman

Posted by: Mitch Maltenfort at April 4, 2003 09:55 PM

Just to get this outta my clogged system, and maybe get provoke some useful ideas from others:

How about "Lilith Dare," "Lilith Fray" or "Lilith Fierce?"

Each poaches on "Lilith Fair," but that may be just what you want to do.

Alternatively, how about "Lioness Rampant?"

OK..OK...I'll go away now...

Posted by: Chris Schumacher at April 4, 2003 10:06 PM

Considering that Lilith was an arabian demon known for killing children, it probably wouldn't be such a good idea. (Her being Adam's first wife was a Midresh(sp?) attempt to incorporate her into the Hebrew mythology, just like the line of the Nephilim was meant to with the strongmen of Greek legends.) It'd be like having an "Incubus Fair".

Posted by: Alfredo Tarancon at April 4, 2003 10:20 PM

What about...?

Three of a KInd

Lady's Luck

Something about ..."series name"

What's in a girl?

Las Chicas son guerreras (the girls are warriors, uuuugh)

The World Finest Lady's

The Sisterhood of Risk

Femenine instint

The Lady's Genre

The Lady's Game

I understand how much difficult it's to find a name.

Betweeen not writing english perfectly and having no idea about any kind of argot, i doubt many of this will be understood.

Posted by: Peter David at April 4, 2003 10:22 PM

The idiot pretending to be Brian Bendis is nothing of the sort. The problem is that he logs on via AOL, and since AOL assigns IPs randomly, anyone logging in with AOL can wind up being unable to post (including me.) So while we work to get rid of him permanently, I would ask that no one respond to him. We will continue to delete his posts as they come up.

PAD

Posted by: Chadwick at April 4, 2003 10:23 PM

Why not tag the main features of the STORY, instead of the female leads.

Mr. DAvid, what would you consider the main theme of FA and the other books (what ARE these other books? I haven't found info on them yet)

Women seem to just *know* when a guy is trying to sell them something...

Farscape used the "Love Beyond Hope" tag (UK) to great effect...actually, if you want to get women to notice, why not crib some pages from the FS playbook?

In Previews you're selling to love-depraved shop owners...so a 'sexist' :p angle would actually *work*. (Yuck. They buy Image, don't they?)

But for general markets, a female oriented campaign would be needed. I'll contact some of my FS friends (most of whom are women) and ask them for some ideas...

Posted by: Del at April 4, 2003 10:30 PM

To borrow from a Letterman-suggested book by Ike Turner: Womans Be Thinking Too Much

Posted by: Mitch Maltenfort at April 4, 2003 10:31 PM

Chadwick just gave me the answer!

How about "Femmescape?"

>

Posted by: Mike Zeidler at April 4, 2003 11:04 PM

Howabout:

Heaven sent... tainted by darkness.

or

Pure soul, wicked heart.

Posted by: eD! at April 4, 2003 11:15 PM

since i've only seen some art for your book, PAD, and can only guess the sort of art that could be used in the other 2 books...

"Might... With Ample Bosoms"

ok, so p.c. it ain't... but damn if i wouldn't read it.

and, for the record, i liked "Dangerous Curves," too.

-eD!

Posted by: Randall Kirby at April 5, 2003 12:15 AM

I've been discussing it with my friends, and here's what we've got:

Pete Lawson suggests:

Woman, Women, Womyn

Girls Gone Mild

Femme Noir

Hooters and Shooters

Kim Nowacki suggests:

Hell's Belles

Bitch Slap

Talk Dirty to Me

Randall Kirby suggests:

Revenge is a Dish.

(We weren't very good at picking PC names, though. - I'm surprised no one has said "Heroine Addiction" though.)

Posted by: Colier Rannd at April 5, 2003 12:41 AM

"X Chromosome? Who Needs It?"

also

"PAD Writes WonderGirl(or Arrowette) Again!"...ok, maybe not but gosh darnit, I want it to happen!

Col

Posted by: Lee Houston, Junior at April 5, 2003 12:57 AM

For the record, I really did think Peter was just joking when he originally suggested "Dangerous Curves".

Anyway, how about:

REAL Women! Really. (or)

Don't Sterotype. Just Read It!

Well, considering the lateness of the hour and the shortness of series details...

Posted by: Dave at April 5, 2003 01:18 AM

How about Tales of Intuition: story name, taking the most popular response from above, Dangerous Curves for the noir tale, i.e. Tales of Intuition: Dangerous Curves? This could be used for more than three books if successful.

A play on female intuition but catchy enough for the male audience?

Posted by: Chris at April 5, 2003 01:45 AM

Lady (K)night Strikers

I know, its bad, but best I can come up with right now; anyway, my $.02 input: why doesn't PAD market the book with his name in this title? Like John Carpenter does with his movies, the title isn't "Big Trouble in Little China," but "John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China." So the title could be "Peter David's Yadayadayada." Whatever the best option is, obviously, fills in the yada's. But if he puts his name in the title, a) for current readers, they see his name and will read it, b) for new readers, they will see his name and will choose other titles by him after seeing how he treats the characters. Just a thought.

Chris

Posted by: Jason K at April 5, 2003 01:59 AM

Sadly someone already came up with Hell on Heels

Though I might and something to that.

Hell on heels, Hear them Roar.

I really hope I don't have to explain that.

Violent Femmes hear them roar. but that might cause issues with the band.

The Gentler sex? Yeah right!

Girl power is probably totally over used.

Sugar spice but they ain't nice

i'm out for now

Posted by: Paul Jedrzejewska-Selman at April 5, 2003 03:52 AM

How about:

'Three female superheroes walk into a bar...'

Posted by: Robb P. at April 5, 2003 04:48 AM

"U-DECIDE"!!!

:)

Posted by: Gordon at April 5, 2003 05:40 AM

Has anyone suggested POWER GRRRLS!

Sounds like something marketing would pitch...

Posted by: Marketing Man at April 5, 2003 05:42 AM

Ooh,here's another one:

"Can't spell 'Superheroes' without S-H-E."

(or "They put the SHE in 'SuperHEroes'")

Sadly I think most us posters here suck at this. Man, I don't envy DC's Marketing Dept.

Posted by: Luigi Novi at April 5, 2003 06:28 AM

Pussy Galore

Posted by: Hoy Murphy at April 5, 2003 08:06 AM

"What Bill Jemas Reads on Saturday Nights"

--your pal, Hoy

Posted by: bicycle at April 5, 2003 10:33 AM

Strong Women

Sisters of Substance

Who Needs Men?

All That and Brains Too

The Toilet Seat Stays Down

Posted by: SPB at April 5, 2003 10:33 AM

How about:

"Angels of the Night"

"Angels by Night"

or

"Night Angels"

I think the last may be coming to Fox next Fall.

Posted by: Matt Adler at April 5, 2003 10:45 AM

Feminine Mystique

Girls Just Wanna Kick Some

The Fiercer Sex

The Girls Next Door (for ironic contrast)

Posted by: Steve Horton at April 5, 2003 10:59 AM

"Three Abreast"?

Seriously, though:

"Females are Deadlier"

"Vengeance is Hers"

"Hell Hath No Fury"

"Leading Ladies"

-Stev

Posted by: Peter at April 5, 2003 12:28 PM

Just for the record, I brought this up backwards to a female friend of mine, telling her first about women trying to speak for all women, how generalizations are patronizing and such (or matronizing? :p) and she did agree with the dichotomy in genders as to what attracts most men versus most women, but then I told her it all stemmed from the "Dangerous Curves" marketing line and she loved that one, thinking that those objecting to it, well, might not have curves or might not like the idea of a woman being dangerous, heh :) She did add though she'd find it offensive if the three books in question *did* focus on mindless T&A.

Anyway, I don't have a real marketing line idea, but I did come up with one in case Marketing would want to warn off women from these books:

"Just Say Ho!"

All in good fun ;)

Posted by: Travis at April 5, 2003 01:45 PM

"The Verti-Go-Go's"

Sorry... had to put that one in.

Ahem.

How about, and I don't know if you could do this without copyright infringement:

"Violent Femmes"

Or

"Violence Femmes"

Travis

Posted by: Travis at April 5, 2003 01:59 PM

Or to expand even further:

"Ultraviolet Femmes"

"Ultraviolent Femmes"

And I could go on, but it would get more annoying.

Travis

Posted by: Emily Kluesener at April 5, 2003 04:44 PM

Making alternate suggestions would be easier with more information about the three books. But since PAD asked, here is my suggestion.

Blondes Girls have more fun.

The line through Blondes and the word Girls should be written in "lipstick" as if a woman (perhaps one of the heroines) came up and amended the poster. It might not be "risqué" per say, but I think it gets the point across.

Posted by: John Mosby at April 5, 2003 04:58 PM

Peter's right. Harder than it sounds to do this without sounding sexist rather than sexy....

Here goes:

(Sometimes you've got to....) Leave the legwork to experts.

Good Guys Finish Last

(isn't that what most women want?)

On Top. With Attitude.

Posted by: Rachel Kadushin at April 5, 2003 06:26 PM

In general I agree with the comment of doing something based on the characters or stories, but without any further info...

If you want to attract women, anything with "Ladies" in the title ain't going to cut it.

There were a few above I really liked:

From Kevin Brown:

3 women

Each with a goal

Each with a secret

Each with a mystery

Each unlike any woman you've ever known

From Marketing Man:

"Beauty, brains and butt-kicking." This would fit well into using Bodacious from the mythic Celtic heroine Bodica. (a more neutral name than Lilith)

and of course my personal favorite (though Dangerous Curves may be more marketable) from Alex Baker:

"My Eyes Are Up Here, Pig!"

Posted by: Lee Grice at April 5, 2003 08:23 PM

(Two damn days too late but what the hell...)

HEROINE CHIC

Posted by: Tony D'Arezzo at April 5, 2003 08:32 PM

One word over the limit but how about -

Our Bodies,

Our Minds,

Our Fights

Posted by: Jeff Morris at April 5, 2003 08:38 PM

Night is a Woman.

JSM

Posted by: SlashKaBob at April 5, 2003 08:54 PM

Dangerous Curves is the BEST - and I'd go back and fight for it. Here's some more, anyway...

Girls Night Out

Dark Roses

Seductive Tales

Sirens

Beauty and Power

Irresistible Forces

Broken Hearts

Best of luck, PAD!

Posted by: zuradin at April 5, 2003 09:37 PM

If you want to attract women, anything with "Ladies" in the title ain't going to cut it.

why?

Posted by: Peter David at April 5, 2003 09:47 PM

but then I told her it all stemmed from the "Dangerous Curves" marketing line and she loved that one, thinking that those objecting to it, well, might not have curves or might not like the idea of a woman being dangerous, heh :

I wanna meet her. I like her style.

PAD

Posted by: Rachel Kadushin at April 5, 2003 10:58 PM

Zuradin asked about my response: If you want to attract women, anything with "Ladies" in the title ain't going to cut it.

why?

I do not think there are many women under the age of 30 who would like to be called a lady or who are familiar with the idea of being called a lady except in terms of a father telling their 5 to 11 year old daughter "Young Lady come down from there right now."

And along those lines in my opinion and experience, except in literature having to do with nobility, "lady" has fallen out of Contemporary American English as an appropriate reference to a strong, capable woman... with the exception of very formal complements... sorta the formal version of "hon" or "honey" -- which if said nicely can be complementary, but in isolation comes across as dimunative.

Posted by: Ratbat at April 5, 2003 11:17 PM

What, no-one's trotted out the ever-classic 'Venus Envy'?

Posted by: Cat at April 6, 2003 12:08 AM

The whole "grrl" thing bugged me when it was in vogue a couple of years ago, but these two things were all I could come up with without knowing anything much about the comics:

  1. Putting The Grrr In Girl

  • These Boots Are Gonna Walk All Over You


  • I've said it before and I'll say it again: I'm not marketer. I think that's bloody obvious now. Especially since I could only think of one five-word line, and a big, fat cliché at that. The other I just couldn't resist. I mean, has no one heard that song in their head while scrolling through this thread?

    Posted by: Cat at April 6, 2003 12:11 AM

    Oh! How about:

    • Don't Even Think Of Calling Them "Babe"

    (or "Calling Them 'Chick' " or "Calling Them 'Honey' ")

    ...Arg! Too many words! I'm so very much not the marketing type!

    Posted by: PCL at April 6, 2003 05:01 AM

    How about...

    Three Dames To Kill For

    Posted by: Lis at April 6, 2003 12:53 PM

    I enjoy rhetoric and debate. I always thought that denigrating one's opponents was a sign that one wasn't capable of arguing the issues (a weakness in either your debating skills or the merits of your side).

    those objecting to it, well, might not have curves or might not like the idea of a woman being dangerous

    So now we're flat-chested. May as well go whole-hog and say we're frigid and hysterical while you're at it. Pay no mind to those silly girls who don't know what they're talking about...

    If you really want to turn women readers away from these titles, keep writing like this. I'm a huge PAD fan from way back (among the rarer items in my collection are his first published story in Asimov's and the script to Knight Life), and these threads are pissing me off.

    The notion that only successful creators are allowed to criticize is also a fallacy -- one I'm surprised (and dismayed) that you're succumbing to. I don't need to be a professional chef to express an intelligent opinion on the food at particular restaurants. I don't need to be a filmmaker to review films. I don't need to be a poet to discuss Shakespeare's sonnets, and I don't need to be a marketer to critique your idea. By that logic, maybe you should stop writing about the Bush administration and the war with Iraq unless you can conduct a better foreign policy.

    I'll also point out that you're stacking the deck by challenging folks to come up with a "better" slogan without giving any information about the other titles, despite repeated requests. And then you get all snarky ("Good angle to take...") and smug because we can't meet your high standards, because you haven't given folks the necessary backgroud. Not nice.

    Look. You've been told the slogan "Dangerous Curves" may turn some women away from these titles. You can ignore it, debate it, incorporate it, or whatever. But resorting to insults and sarcasm against those who pointed it out? I thought you were better than that. I feel disappointed and disillusioned.

    Posted by: Lis at April 6, 2003 03:12 PM

    PAD wrote: My reading of the thread had a majority of people chiming in going "Yeah! Women will be offended!

    I went back and reread the posts in the threads dealing with the "Dangerous Curves" slogan (skimming those that wandered off into other tangents such as general misogyny or misandry). The earliest comments about finding the slogan offensive were not made by those critical of the slogan. They were made by those criticizing the critics. Elayne Riggs (who thru her work with Friends of Lulu probably knows something about attracting women to comics) very explicitly said that her comments are about effectiveness, not offensiveness.

    But people defending the slogan (including you) ignored that and kept turning it back to a simple matter of offensiveness. And then, that's been used as a strawman to attack the critics as being too sensitive ("the kind of woman that gets offended at damn near anything.")

    In other words, posters are stereotyping the critics into something more easily held up for ridicule, and then using that strawman to set up an impossible challenge that nobody was asking for ("can't be offensive to any woman anywhere") rather than dealing with the substance of the arguments against the slogan.

    If, as your initial post began, you're hoping to "attract that great untapped resource, women" then you could do much worse than consult with Friends of Lulu for how best to market inclusively.

    If, however, you're "not out to court a gender" as you wrote later, then this doesn't matter.

    But expecting to attract women to your titles and belittling those who try to advise you on tactics that might not work... that's both illogical and counterproductive

    Posted by: Hooper at April 6, 2003 05:22 PM

    "Let's Hear It For The Girls"

    Yeah, I know it's six words.

    Hooper

    Posted by: Hooper at April 6, 2003 05:24 PM

    "Let's Hear It For The Girls"

    Yeah, I know it's six words.

    Hooper

    Posted by: Peter at April 6, 2003 07:25 PM

    Lis, the bit you highlighted didn't come from PAD, it came from me, a wholly different Peter. So he wasn't denigrating anyone, as far as I can tell.

    Neither did I, at that. The comment you got dismayed at was made by a woman who is very sensible, who thinks men can easily be lured by sex while women generally need something more substantial, and who apparently felt that anyone getting on their high horse over a simple punny marketing line (the best one so far, let's face it) is taking him- or herself far too seriously.

    As I also pointed out, she thought it'd be offensive if the books *were* centering around T&A. Most likely, they're not (this is DC, not Marvel). But based on what little we all know, "Dangerous Curves" is harmless, amusing, reminiscent of film noir *and* indicating that these new titles could throw us an interesting curve.

    I don't have to be a marketeer to recognize that this is a great line (okay, so I'm studying marketing, doesn't mean anything ;)). But anyway, I thought I'd present a female point of view alongside my own, so if you're going to get annoyed, get annoyed at the right person :)

    I can't help it if the automatic reaction to a silly argument is "hey, they're being silly". It sort of comes with the nature of the argument :p

    PS to PAD: I'll pass your positive interest in her style along to my friend ;) (ironically enough, she's not really into your writing style, most of the time, heh--though I very much am, also most of the time, since even the best writers produce clunkers sometimes :p) I thought it was a very nice compliment though, appreciating your style the way I do, so thanks already from my end :)

    Posted by: Josh Bales at April 6, 2003 10:01 PM

    Here's my two cents:

    Enter at Own Risk

    Angels of the Otherworldly

    Dangerous Make-up

    Kiss and Tell

    Kiss and Make-up

    Glamorous Looks, Dangerous Moves

    No Strangers to Danger

    Fight Now, Make-up Later

    Angels Under Siege

    Unfeminine Mystique

    Posted by: Lis at April 6, 2003 10:30 PM

    A different Peter wrote: The comment you got dismayed at was made by a woman...As I also pointed out, she thought it'd be offensive if the books *were* centering around T&A.

    I know that, but PAD quoted that comment approvingly.

    My point was (and remains), those who were initially objecting to that line weren't doing so because they were offended or thought that women would be offended.

    The original complaint suggested that for women who aren't regular comic readers (maybe nonreaders, maybe just manga), that slogan might reinforce stereotypes about the types of women in mainstream comic books. Notice that's not saying anything about offensiveness, just that they'll nod and assume more bad girls that they wouldn't be interested in reading.

    Now, instead of asking your female friend whether she thought women would or should be offended by that slogan, ask whether she thinks that slogan would (in PAD's words) "attract that great untapped resource, women." Would the slogan "Dangerous Curves" interest her or her female friends into buying those titles? What might they assume about the books in question if they saw that slogan? Forget offensiveness. Would it be effective?

    Posted by: Nova Land at April 7, 2003 04:16 AM

    Let me approach this from a slightly different angle -- past marketing lines that worked on me.

    1. Put on a costume to fight crime in the streets? You'd have to be crazy!" That was used to market Mike Baron's Badger. It grabbed my attention (and my money) because it described what sounded like a very interesting premise for a comic.

    2. She really is on a mission from God. That was used to market Evangeline. Again, it hooked me because it succinctly described an interesting-sounding premise. (The series itself, alas, focused too much on action, ignoring or underplaying much of the potential promised by the ad line.)

    It's close to 2 decades later, and both those lines have stuck with me.

    Instead of a marketing line designed to tell us the main characters of these 3 books are female, I'd go for a marketing line that described the story hooks. (Not knowing what those hooks are yet, I'm unable to come up with such a line.)

    Using the word she or her in the line would be enough to tip most of us off that the book has a female lead.

    Posted by: Rachel Kadushin at April 7, 2003 10:18 AM

    Oooh. Really like most of Josh Bales' suggestions. Just scroll up two posts and re-read them!

    Posted by: No more italics at April 7, 2003 11:30 AM

    Posting solely to end the unclosed tag.

    Posted by: No more italics at April 7, 2003 11:30 AM

    Note to self - don't preview, just post.

    Posted by: Rob at April 7, 2003 01:20 PM

    Estrogen on Edge

    Rag Time

    PMS is for Sissies

    Three for the Moon

    Yep, stick with Dangerous Curves.

    Posted by: Cheryl at April 7, 2003 01:55 PM

    "Why should guys have all the fun?"

    or

    "Why let guys have all the fun?"

    Posted by: Buddman22 at April 7, 2003 03:06 PM

    "Accessorize This!"

    "Beyond the Mask Era" (think about it)

    "We're girls. So deal."

    "Have issues? Why not?" (again, think about it) or "Have issues? Get ours!"

    "We Carry Our Own Books!"(I don't have to keep telling you to think about it, do I?)

    Didn't know if this was still ongoing, but I thought I'd add my $0.02.

    Budd

    Posted by: Gregg W. Noon at April 7, 2003 03:11 PM

    "Sugar, Spice, Bloody Knuckles and Vice."

    "These boots were made for asskicking"

    "They're Angels? So was the Devil..."

    But then, what do I know? I like "Dangerous Curves".

    Posted by: Buddman22 at April 7, 2003 03:43 PM

    Actually, rereading mine I want to modify two of them. If I may, these are the two I like best:

    "They Carry Their Own Books!"

    or

    "Have Issues? Get Theirs!"

    Budd

    Posted by: Cheryl at April 7, 2003 04:03 PM

    Or how about (in your best Bogart) "Damned dames are takin' over."

    Posted by: Formerly Known As... at April 7, 2003 04:21 PM

    Three Times a Lady

    Posted by: stevew at April 7, 2003 04:41 PM

    Women On the Verge...

    Posted by: Elizabeth at April 7, 2003 05:49 PM

    If this was a democracy, I'd vote for "Femme Noir." That would interest me as a reader more than "Dangerous Curves."

    Humor points to "We Carry Our Own Books." :)

    Posted by: Kurt Busiek at April 7, 2003 08:32 PM

    I ran "Dangerous Curves" by Ann, and she thought it sounded more like something aimed at guys than at female readers. She wasn't offended, she just wasn't terribly interested -- which goes to the point made upthread about it not being about offensiveness, but about effectiveness.

    Many of the suggestions made in this thread boil down to, "Hey, Look! Girls!" which is rather different from a message that says "Hey Girls, Look!" -- a lot of them still seem to be aimed at guys, whether they're couched as instructions ("Don't Even Think About Calling Them Babe") or threats ("These Boots Are Going to Walk All Over You").

    But if you want to appeal to women (by which I mean to large numbers, rather than the totality of women or to specific individual women), then the message would seem to need to say more than "Hey! Girls Here!" For one thing, focusing on the mere presence of female leads seems clueless, as if that alone is enough -- "Girlfrenzy" seemed to promise a catfight (or maybe a mosh pit), and "Dangerous Curves" seems to promise hot babes more than it does capable heroines. It might be different if it wasn't comics -- but in comics, the expectation is that women are objectified more often than not, so if it sounds anything like "Bad Girls for Fanboys," it'll be taken that way. The context is part of the message.

    As such, I tend to think slogans with "Girls," "Ladies," "Curves," "Glamour," "Kisses," "Heels," "Make-Up" and other such words that would seem utterly normal on the cover of COSMO, would in the world of comics come off as leering or objectifying. A little too "You've Come a Long Way, Superbaby." Women aren't all about makeup and curves, but comics have a bad enough track record that the slogan isn't going to be taken as just one aspect of an assumed well-rounded treatment, but as a hint toward objectification. If the only thing in the slogan that identifies it as female-oriented is about appearance, then it's an exterior statement, and the default assumption is that it's stories about women aimed at guys. If the only word that identifies the slogan as female-oriented is "Girl" or "Lady," it's again more likely to be taken as an exterior comment. It's a tricky business, appealing to an audience whose general assumption is that you're all about appealing to someone else, but if it was easy, comics wouldn't have failed at it so often.

    And slogans like "Taking Back the Night" are empowering when said by women, but when said by men seem a little patronizing, a kind of "Aww, look at what the chicks are up to, ain't it cute?" It's co-opting, and it backfires as often as it works.

    And yeah, maybe at this point you're wondering, if you're going to assume the audience is this sensitive, why even try? I'd make two points in response -- first, that the whole point of outreach is to reach an audience not predisposed to like you, so if you can get the easy ones, fine, but if you can get the tough ones too, then that's even better. And second, that even customers you think are overly sensitive have money to spend. Promotion's about getting them to spend it, not about dismissing them as unreasonable.

    Of all the slogans above, there were a couple that did the job content-wise but had no zing ("Strong Women," for instance, is a label, not an enticement; it's, you should pardon the expression, flat). The only one that struck me as having elements that seemed empowering and enticing was "Females Are Deadlier," but even then I'd recast it as "Deadlier Than The Male."

    It identifies the books as being about women without resorting to being about appearance -- it's not external. And it says they're tough and capable. And sure, it's from a line about black widow spiders, but even so, it's more about capability than appearance.

    And if the line is FALLEN ANGEL, CINNAMON and some other book, it at least fits the two we know about.

    kdb

    Posted by: zuradin at April 7, 2003 09:25 PM

    And along those lines in my opinion and experience, except in literature having to do with nobility, "lady" has fallen out of Contemporary American English as an appropriate reference to a strong, capable woman... with the exception of very formal complements... sorta the formal version of "hon" or "honey" -- which if said nicely can be complementary, but in isolation comes across as dimunative.

    now that is a shame

    Posted by: zuradin at April 7, 2003 09:30 PM

    A different Peter wrote: The comment you got dismayed at was made by a woman...As I also pointed out, she thought it'd be offensive if the books *were* centering around T&A.

    I know that, but PAD quoted that comment approvingly.

    My point was (and remains), those who were initially objecting to that line weren't doing so because they were offended or thought that women would be offended.

    The original complaint suggested that for women who aren't regular comic readers (maybe nonreaders, maybe just manga), that slogan might reinforce stereotypes about the types of women in mainstream comic books. Notice that's not saying anything about offensiveness, just that they'll nod and assume more bad girls that they wouldn't be interested in reading.

    Now, instead of asking your female friend whether she thought women would or should be offended by that slogan, ask whether she thinks that slogan would (in PAD's words) "attract that great untapped resource, women." Would the slogan "Dangerous Curves" interest her or her female friends into buying those titles? What might they assume about the books in question if they saw that slogan? Forget offensiveness. Would it be effective?

    course you seem to forget the line would come hopefully come with artwork etc. the would help convey the intention/feeling of the line

    Posted by: Kurt Busiek at April 7, 2003 09:31 PM

    Richard Howell suggests...

    Gyn-O-Mite!

    kdb

    Posted by: Gerard at April 8, 2003 04:01 AM

    The best I could come up with with was "The Females of the Species...". After all, Deadlier than the Male is already taken.

    Posted by: mike at April 8, 2003 07:21 AM

    I pulled out my record collection while updating my website. And it just hit me.

    Undiscovered Pleasures.

    It's suggestive, it leads to a lot of meanings- all of which might apply to the titles in question.

    just a thought

    Posted by: Rachel Kadushin at April 8, 2003 09:11 AM

    I was listening to Billy Joel the other day, and while I don't usually recommend using song lyrics -- why not some varition on some of the lyrics in this song --

    "...(she's) Always a Woman (to me)"

    but not going with a cliche like "women's work"

    Perhaps "Always a Woman _"

    the blank could be a rotating sentiment by month.

    Posted by: Scavenger at April 8, 2003 11:54 AM

    Can't be used, but I do like the "Heroine-Chic" line mentioned above.

    And what is this Cinnamon mentioned by Kurt Busiek.....

    Posted by: Kurt Busiek at April 8, 2003 01:19 PM

    At comicon.com's "Pulse" site, there's an article up about the new CINNAMON series by ... I think it's Jen van Meter.

    It being part of this new troika is just a guess on my part.

    kdb

    Posted by: JaNell at April 8, 2003 03:07 PM

    My really cliche teasing suggestions for a
    TITLE:
    Y? Not!

    Hera Chicks

    Unfeminine Mystique

    Cron(e)ic Danger

    Triple XX Action!

    The Sisters of Merciless

    The Adventures of Ms. Anthrope

    Mind, Less Bimbos

    UnTrampled

    Remember, I was *j/k* on the above.

    More serious, slightly less cheesy suggestions for tidals, er, I mean, titles:

    Diana Noir

    Athena Risen

    Luna Regina

    Obsidian Visage

    Morrigan, Morgaine, Morgan

    *sigh*

    Tough parameters, trying to scream "woman" without using any of the more cliched cliches.

    Posted by: Caravan Shaker at April 8, 2003 08:35 PM

    This is about finding a tagline that falls enticingly on neophyte female ears without running the fellas off, right? Okay, I'll have a go.

    All Damsels, No Distress

    Heroine...Uncut

    Men Rule...That's The Problem

    X = POWER!

    I'll "Weaker Sex" You, Y'bastard

    Cunning, Stunning, and Stilleto-Sharp

    Got Power?

    And, of course, my personal favorite:

    THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOU

    Trust me...a lot of women will gravitate to that last one.

    Let me conclude by saying that "Sisterhood Of Risk" is rather catchy, and that "Gyn-o-mite" is the worst bloody pun since "show me the Monet". Personally, I dont' find 'Dangerous Curves' offensive, just a little tired. I expect more from the guy who managed to sneak the line "There's nothing wrong with DICK" into a hetero vs. homo debate in a very mainstream comic. Ironically, he's the same guy who gave us "show me the Monet". Go figure.

    Posted by: lloyd at April 9, 2003 10:50 AM

    The only one I've seen that I *really* is Josh Bales'

    Kiss and Tell

    What about:

    Feminine Savant

    I am not your doll

    What She Said

    Her-story

    By the grace of Godess

    Posted by: Luigi Novi at April 9, 2003 02:35 PM

    Hey, why don't we ask Dave Sim what slogan he would come up with? That should sure satisfy the feminists!

    Posted by: Thomas Moudry at April 10, 2003 01:13 PM

    I really like "Dangerous Curves," but here are some other ideas:

    "All's fair..."

    "More than meets the eye..."

    "More than skin deep..."